why here we dont discuss much abt grok

freejobalerts

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2025
Messages
287
Reaction score
44
its good ai for video generate
even of we dont give prompt it create video that also awesome
now its got paid
but we hardly discuss here
 
Maybe it’s because we have Google Veo 3.1?

I haven’t tried Grok for videos in a while, but when I did, the results were awful.
 
Grok is very nice, i have clients that use it. If you are geeting a bad result, i guess you gave a poor prompting.
 
It sounds like you’re talking about an AI video tool that can generate videos automatically even without detailed prompts, which is why it feels so impressive. Many tools like Runway ML, Pika, or Kaiber have similar features, and most of them start free but later move to paid plans as they grow. The reason people don’t discuss it much is usually because these tools change fast, and new ones keep appearing. If you like it, it can still be worth using-just make sure it actually saves you time or helps you create content that performs better.
 
Maybe it’s because we have Google Veo 3.1?

I haven’t tried Grok for videos in a while, but when I did, the results were awful.
u mean video quality of character actions
It sounds like you’re talking about an AI video tool that can generate videos automatically even without detailed prompts, which is why it feels so impressive. Many tools like Runway ML, Pika, or Kaiber have similar features, and most of them start free but later move to paid plans as they grow. The reason people don’t discuss it much is usually because these tools change fast, and new ones keep appearing. If you like it, it can still be worth using-just make sure it actually saves you time or helps you create content that performs better.
automatically even without detailed prompts, yes but grok understand it very well
 
because it is subpar in all areas to other models more or less. we discuss OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc. models because in one way or another all of them have something to offer that are, if not the best in their respective area, at least in the top 3

grok video is ok, definitely getting there but still not fantastic imo
 
Grok is one of the reasons I find benchmarks to be disingenuous.

If you use Veo for video or claud for code, heck kimi 2.5 for design you feel it will perform
a lot better than Grok.
 
Yeah it’s good, no doubt.

But people here mostly talk about what helps them make money or gives consistent results. Grok is still new in that space, so not many real case studies yet.

Also, many users are already familiar with tools like Runway or Pika, so they stick with what’s working.

Once more people start getting results from it, you’ll see more discussions for sure.
 
It's just a micro-niche here with very little followers as most people are interested in SEO and making money online. You can see a spike in discussion if someone discovers a method to earn money using Grok.
 
Maybe it’s because we have Google Veo 3.1?

I haven’t tried Grok for videos in a while, but when I did, the results were awful.
not india
Grok is very nice, i have clients that
It sounds like you’re talking about an AI video tool that can generate videos automatically even without detailed prompts, which is why it feels so impressive. Many tools like Runway ML, Pika, or Kaiber have similar features, and most of them start free but later move to paid plans as they grow. The reason people don’t discuss it much is usually because these tools change fast, and new ones keep appearing. If you like it, it can still be worth using-just make sure it actually saves you time or helps you create content that performs better.
yes but they discuss those tools
 
Honestly, I’m not a pro, just dabbling. Grok seemed promising a while back, but the results were meh for my needs—quality was okay but not great. I’ve kept an eye on it and I’ll test updates. Has anyone here had better results recently?
 
Back
Top