Wilson Grant Fisk
Elite Member
- Nov 10, 2012
- 15,677
- 46,839
I am flattered but I don't swing that way. I suggest a cold shower or your usual rent boy.
Why big sites are never punished
- Thread starter misteryou.
- Start date
I am flattered but I don't swing that way. I suggest a cold shower or your usual rent boy.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 4,701
- 1,636
Google Love Authority... A Secret Relationship between them, they love each other (google & authority site). 
To become Google's girlfriend, your site need to be high authority.
To know "how to make authority site" read BHW SEO forum more & more.
Read the Journey: Building a "authority site" from scratch step by step Journey
To become Google's girlfriend, your site need to be high authority.
To know "how to make authority site" read BHW SEO forum more & more.
Read the Journey: Building a "authority site" from scratch step by step Journey
MarketingFist
Junior Member
- Jul 4, 2014
- 155
- 39
Big sites are reviewed so much time by Google and after they built reputation google almost wont check them at all
- Jun 20, 2013
- 11,507
- 8,912
Because Google is a bitch and Bitches like big boys.
MarketingFist
Junior Member
- Jul 4, 2014
- 155
- 39
Original answer.
Yahoo Voices, eHow, Helium, etc. were all big sites that were raking in the money via google search with google adsense. Hundreds of writers, thousands of content, and millions of dollars per year. They flooded Google search with their crap. It was only when other companies, news sites, and popular bloggers started complaining that Google took a stand. Those sites were part of the reason why Google started with all these major updates.
If I am not mistaken, even ebay got on Google's bad side.
Now the only reason why Google won't go after other big sites is because Google need them just as much as they need Google.
If I am not mistaken, even ebay got on Google's bad side.
Now the only reason why Google won't go after other big sites is because Google need them just as much as they need Google.
Jack Torrance
Power Member
- Oct 18, 2014
- 544
- 169
Not accurate at all. I wrote all my stuff by hand and I'm English born and raised, even got qualifications in English Lit, people were naturally sharing my stuff on forums (sadly forums are NoFollow)... Yet Penguin still hit my site, probably due to the disgraceful links bought here last year. Good quality writing isn't going to protect you honestly. I don't think their robot is even capable of detecting good quality... I'm trying to be careful now of using dupe subheadings... But ofc when you're running a review site (I don't personally) or similar there's only so many ways you can write "Pros" "Cons" and "Summary" before you start re-hashing.
superstar55
Junior Member
- Jan 26, 2012
- 124
- 6
Maybe because they are aged and they passed a lot of tests.
The real answers are:
1. They are unable to identify spam or bad content. So what are they doing? The chances are higher that a big brand has better content then the rest. Simple as that.
Eric Schmidt sayed some years ago: Brands are the answer...
2. Also if people are searching for a website often... that means they want to see it. And user expierience is more important then google guidelines. As long as searchers are happy, they search and google gets money...
3. Big publishers have power. They can harm google with lobbying, in court, bad press and so on...
1. They are unable to identify spam or bad content. So what are they doing? The chances are higher that a big brand has better content then the rest. Simple as that.
Eric Schmidt sayed some years ago: Brands are the answer...
2. Also if people are searching for a website often... that means they want to see it. And user expierience is more important then google guidelines. As long as searchers are happy, they search and google gets money...
3. Big publishers have power. They can harm google with lobbying, in court, bad press and so on...
- Jan 23, 2014
- 4,883
- 356
Big sites have quality content and many real visitors and huge traffic, people find many useful informations on those sites, so G always make favour the site which provide useful information to people
Shadeofblack
Power Member
- Dec 26, 2011
- 577
- 175
Please keep your Anti-Semitism (opinions of Google maybe) to yourself.
I find your questioning offensive.
Have a good day!
I find your questioning offensive.
Have a good day!
Los Angeles SEO Agency
Power Member
- Sep 2, 2012
- 738
- 350
Hey OP,
The majority of sites you mentioned all have a huge # of backlinks, well aged domain, lots of content and High PR. DA/PA
Take a look at http://news.yahoo.com/ for example.
- PR 9 (very rare)
- 177,937,451 backlinks in ahrefs
- Alex rank 4
Any site with the above metrics is sure to dominate almost any keyword in its niche and vertical. Hence why you see wikipedia, amazon, ebay and yahoo news on Page 1 so often, their domain metrics are just on a whole another level.
Hope this helps answer your question
~SDSEOGURU
The majority of sites you mentioned all have a huge # of backlinks, well aged domain, lots of content and High PR. DA/PA
Take a look at http://news.yahoo.com/ for example.
- PR 9 (very rare)
- 177,937,451 backlinks in ahrefs
- Alex rank 4
Any site with the above metrics is sure to dominate almost any keyword in its niche and vertical. Hence why you see wikipedia, amazon, ebay and yahoo news on Page 1 so often, their domain metrics are just on a whole another level.
Hope this helps answer your question
~SDSEOGURU
Shadeofblack
Power Member
- Dec 26, 2011
- 577
- 175
Why not embrace your opinions/theories and invest in these companies/sites. Who knows, you may be able to piggy back off their page/domain authority and leech some of that Zionist $$$ that you are so offended by.
PrivateCube
Junior Member
- Nov 25, 2014
- 123
- 12
Because they are big, so they provide huge load of contents.
dsan996
Regular Member
- Apr 18, 2014
- 342
- 169
They do get punished sometimes but it always looks more like a warning to the rest of the webmasters than a standard penalty:
When a big brand gets hit everybody notices and the news spread really fast: if you do this or that against the guidelines you'll get hit. It's better for scaring people than a hundred Matt Cutts videos.
Then the brand makes a minor fix and the penalty/manual action gets instantly removed. As a small webmaster you should expect months of hard work to resolve the same penalty, but when a big brand gets hit the whole industry is watching. Google knows it and that's why they are so quick to remove the penalty sending a new message to the folks around: if you behave good, you'll be fine.
Code:
http://marketingland.com/10-big-brands-that-were-penalized-by-google-69646When a big brand gets hit everybody notices and the news spread really fast: if you do this or that against the guidelines you'll get hit. It's better for scaring people than a hundred Matt Cutts videos.
Then the brand makes a minor fix and the penalty/manual action gets instantly removed. As a small webmaster you should expect months of hard work to resolve the same penalty, but when a big brand gets hit the whole industry is watching. Google knows it and that's why they are so quick to remove the penalty sending a new message to the folks around: if you behave good, you'll be fine.
propertyse
Registered Member
- May 3, 2012
- 50
- 12
Huffington Post has been punished for selling links before. Wordpress has been penalised for their footer links before too... Please do your research on such websites before hand.
seohosting
Newbie
- Nov 19, 2014
- 23
- 8
Lots of quality content, lots of time, lots of work. Provide value to visitors. You can earn the right to get a bit spammy with Google.
WhiteHatTryHard
Registered Member
- Oct 28, 2014
- 82
- 15
Brands are much harder to hit with negative SEO or simialr, becasue they have so many quality and brand signals.
Google just knows far too uch about them and has signals that thell them beyond the shadow of a doubt that they have a loyal following.
So they will ignore quite a few lo-quality sighals.
I say that having run multiple medium-sized brands.
Has nothig to do with zionism... a good trusted brand is just a safer bet than a 3 month old EMD with no signals at all (or only links).
Google just knows far too uch about them and has signals that thell them beyond the shadow of a doubt that they have a loyal following.
So they will ignore quite a few lo-quality sighals.
I say that having run multiple medium-sized brands.
Has nothig to do with zionism... a good trusted brand is just a safer bet than a 3 month old EMD with no signals at all (or only links).
