Why Are There No Good Bulk-Domain Checkers?

twilightofidols

Power Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
675
Reaction score
227
That just WORK.

I'm looking for something that can take 20,000 domains ANY TLD and check them in minutes. Is there some sort of limitation that would prevent a software from doing this?

I've literally downloaded every software I can find and they are either buggy and don't work properly, or haven't been supported in years. I'm tired of wasting money of software that just doesn't work.

Copying and pasting into GoDaddy is getting absolutely ridiculous, and there's no browser based free checker I know that can handle more than 1,000. How do you guys handle mass checking domains? Is there any low-cost or affordable solution out there?
 
Checking for availability or checking for whois records?

Their are over 200 TLD's currently so you're asking to check the availability of over 4 million individual domains on something browser based in minutes?

I think you're being a bit unrealistic.
 
Open 40 tabs and paste 500 domains in each in godaddy bulk checker. Copy all the available domains in the last tab(As the domains are carried over to next tabs) and you should get what you want. It takes a bit of work but is the most accurate method.
 
Checking for availability or checking for whois records?

Their are over 200 TLD's currently so you're asking to check the availability of over 4 million individual domains on something browser based in minutes?

I think you're being a bit unrealistic.

Checking if they are available for hand registration.

I mean a list of fully qualified TLDs so let's pretend 20k domains in total.

.com
.net
.org
.us
.be
.ca
.uk
.de

etc... Is this unrealistic? Even for an automation software?
 
umm type bulk domain checker in google. I found a relatively "reliable" web tool but you couldn't check more than 3k domains at once without my computer going ape..

Been there bro, have tried 4 different softwares so far. One can handle a good amount, but once you throw foreign TLDs in the mix it starts returning errors.
 
Back
Top