which proxies are working best with LinkedIn + Incogniton? (anyone running linkedIn/FB/Insta on same proxy/browser profile?)

KJREDDY247@

Elite Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
4,287
Reaction score
2,777
looking for proxy recommendations that are working well with linkedIn + incogniton or any other browsers?

anyone running LinkedIn + FB + Instagram on the same proxy with separate fingerprint profiles?
basically like each proxy handles 1 LinkedIn + 1 Facebook + 1 Instagram account kind?

anyone tried this?
 
There is not one proxy provider that works best for a specific website, but I do not think you have meant that.

But your question is good because people always aks which anti detect etc, now the ADs come with plenty of footguns and you must know how to set them up, the default settings will guarantee you the worst OPsec you could image for operations bigger than 2,3 accounts.

But the proxy providers are on a whole other level as far marketing dishonesty goes, did you know they sell amazon firesticks as residential proxies? Nothing wrong with that if the whole TCP noise is spoofed, but precisely zero providers do that, and out of 1000 tested residential proxies, there will be perhaps one , but mostl yzero proper Windows machines.

This is trivial to detect and this is something no anti detect browser can mask away, they say you cant put lipstick on a pig, but here it is even worse, the TCP fingerprint and the Anti detect layers do not even exist in the same OSI layer/universe.

Thanks goodness that most websites outsource initial checks to CF and Captcha which never says 100% human or bot but returns a variable percentage and businesses do not wanna risk false positives. So these residential proxies get away with a properly set up anti detect.

Mobile AD profiles are brittle and can be easily stopped by platoforms(force user to open an app from app store for example), but mobile proxy networks get plenty of trust because NAT assigns up to 400 devices to 1 IP, it is an uncontrollable mess.

So whats left, the various protocols, HTTP is as leaky as it gets, you know the song "6 million ways to die, chose one" , thats http proxies. Some providers do not even bother to clean up the headers.

Socks5 proxies are safer because they dont read/write headers, they just pass data, but even if they support UDP, which of course the vast majority does not, they can leak your real IP upon first netwrok request unless the AD is not set up in a very specific way.

So what can be done, I have build myself a tool which checks the exit IPs in real time and trust me, the results are terrible and some platforms absolutelly have a real time IP checker integrated and running at all time.

If you dont know how to check a proxy yourself or dont have a real tool thats not a landing page for a provider then your ride will be wild and the account shutdowns numerous.
 
There is not one proxy provider that works best for a specific website, but I do not think you have meant that.

But your question is good because people always aks which anti detect etc, now the ADs come with plenty of footguns and you must know how to set them up, the default settings will guarantee you the worst OPsec you could image for operations bigger than 2,3 accounts.

But the proxy providers are on a whole other level as far marketing dishonesty goes, did you know they sell amazon firesticks as residential proxies? Nothing wrong with that if the whole TCP noise is spoofed, but precisely zero providers do that, and out of 1000 tested residential proxies, there will be perhaps one , but mostl yzero proper Windows machines.

This is trivial to detect and this is something no anti detect browser can mask away, they say you cant put lipstick on a pig, but here it is even worse, the TCP fingerprint and the Anti detect layers do not even exist in the same OSI layer/universe.

Thanks goodness that most websites outsource initial checks to CF and Captcha which never says 100% human or bot but returns a variable percentage and businesses do not wanna risk false positives. So these residential proxies get away with a properly set up anti detect.

Mobile AD profiles are brittle and can be easily stopped by platoforms(force user to open an app from app store for example), but mobile proxy networks get plenty of trust because NAT assigns up to 400 devices to 1 IP, it is an uncontrollable mess.

So whats left, the various protocols, HTTP is as leaky as it gets, you know the song "6 million ways to die, chose one" , thats http proxies. Some providers do not even bother to clean up the headers.

Socks5 proxies are safer because they dont read/write headers, they just pass data, but even if they support UDP, which of course the vast majority does not, they can leak your real IP upon first netwrok request unless the AD is not set up in a very specific way.

So what can be done, I have build myself a tool which checks the exit IPs in real time and trust me, the results are terrible and some platforms absolutelly have a real time IP checker integrated and running at all time.

If you dont know how to check a proxy yourself or dont have a real tool thats not a landing page for a provider then your ride will be wild and the account shutdowns numerous.

thanks for the detailed breakdown

if you have any proxy brands or specific test methods you recommend (actually that was my posts main intension) , I am all ears. also if you have tips for running safe multi account setups as I mentioned, would love to hear more
 
thanks for the detailed breakdown

if you have any proxy brands or specific test methods you recommend (actually that was my posts main intension) , I am all ears. also if you have tips for running safe multi account setups as I mentioned, would love to hear more
Well sure I do, but let me get that VIP seller status first, then we can do this I guess, its let than 10 days then I do do this:)
 
Well sure I do, but let me get that VIP seller status first, then we can do this I guess, its let than 10 days then I do do this:)

finally some one who knows the rules - well done chap .
 
looking for proxy recommendations that are working well with linkedIn + incogniton or any other browsers?

anyone running LinkedIn + FB + Instagram on the same proxy with separate fingerprint profiles?
basically like each proxy handles 1 LinkedIn + 1 Facebook + 1 Instagram account kind?

anyone tried this?

You don't want to have 1 IP for everything. That's extremely suspicious since both home and mobile devices are almost exclusively have dynamic IP (exception will be if you willingly buy static IP address at home). What you need is a mobile proxy paid by time since those are using private devices (5g modems or even real smartphones, as oppose to using someone else smartphone which can be turned off at any point). You can then use this mobile IP for all websites at once and even more - you can wait IP to rotate and use same proxy with different account on same website.

But as in the first reply - anti-detection is a big part, mobile proxy just removes IP from calculation.

I would talk about residential, but nowadays their quality is crap.
 
looking for proxy recommendations that are working well with linkedIn + incogniton or any other browsers?

anyone running LinkedIn + FB + Instagram on the same proxy with separate fingerprint profiles?
basically like each proxy handles 1 LinkedIn + 1 Facebook + 1 Instagram account kind?

anyone tried this?
We have the best results with mobile proxies and have our own farm (not for sale unfortunately), but you can find mobile proxy providers out there that outperform static for this use case
 
thanks for the detailed breakdown

if you have any proxy brands or specific test methods you recommend (actually that was my posts main intension) , I am all ears. also if you have tips for running safe multi account setups as I mentioned, would love to hear more
Okay, now the VIP status is here so feel free to get in touch:)
 
If you post in the WTB section, sellers like myself can recommend our products but right here it's against the rules
 
I suggest you use your mobile network.
Buy an esim and try.
 
looking for proxy recommendations that are working well with linkedIn + incogniton or any other browsers?

anyone running LinkedIn + FB + Instagram on the same proxy with separate fingerprint profiles?
basically like each proxy handles 1 LinkedIn + 1 Facebook + 1 Instagram account kind?

anyone tried this?
V2 of proxyempire is working very well. This is what I'm using : 0 issue.
 
running linkedin + fb + instagram on the same proxy per profile is doable but risky. the problem isn't really the proxy, it's that if one account gets flagged the investigation can cascade to the others sharing the same ip.

for linkedin specifically, static ISP proxies work best because linkedin is extremely aggressive with datacenter and even some residential ip detection. i'd recommend one proxy per linkedin account minimum, then you can stack fb + ig on the same profile if needed since those platforms are slightly more lenient on ip sharing.

for incogniton or any antidetect browser, the key is making sure each profile has consistent fingerprint settings and the proxy geo matches the account's supposed location. don't rotate proxies across profiles, keep each one locked to a dedicated ip.
 
looking for proxy recommendations that are working well with linkedIn + incogniton or any other browsers?

anyone running LinkedIn + FB + Instagram on the same proxy with separate fingerprint profiles?
basically like each proxy handles 1 LinkedIn + 1 Facebook + 1 Instagram account kind?

anyone tried this?
It can work, but it’s not the safest setup.

Most people prefer 1 proxy per account/profile to reduce risk. LinkedIn is usually stricter than FB/IG, so mixing them on the same IP might not always be ideal.
 
Residential or Mobile proxies are the best choice for LinkedIn or any kind of social media activity. They use real user IP addresses, which makes them appear more natural and reduces the chance of getting flagged or blocked by the platform.
 
Back
Top