Which link tier system should I go for with web 2.0's?

Jane Hanneman

Junior Member
Joined
May 1, 2014
Messages
126
Reaction score
5
Hi guys,

So I was recommended to try the following link tier system with my web 2.0s feeding juice to my money site. You can see this below..

Clipboard01.jpg

As you can see it means I'm not directly linking the tier 3 level to the tier 2 level. It's more that tier 3's are linking to tier 1.

Do you think I should go with this diagram or should I focus more on tier 3 blogs and profiles linking to my tier 2's?
 
Tier 1 (Web 2.0) <- GSA spam (contextual only) <- GSA/Scrapebox (Every platform and link possible) <- Link Indexing Service (First Pass with GSA Indexer and Second pass with an online service)
 
Tier 1 (Web 2.0) <- GSA spam (contextual only) <- GSA/Scrapebox (Every platform and link possible) <- Link Indexing Service (First Pass with GSA Indexer and Second pass with an online service)
Besides manual web 2.0's and PBN's is there any other way to get quality tier 1 links? The contextuals made by gsa even if you can filter them by PR/DA/TF etc they are spammed to death by other gsa users, pretty much every minute a new post appers on this sites, some have up to 100k posts and because the link juice will be divided to all this links even if they have high PR/DA/TF this sites offers little link juice.
 
Last edited:
There is a big flaw in that diagram - the sites link to each other and that is a big footprint. Don't interlink any of your tier 1, tier 2, or tier 3 links.

So you think I should link them all to my money site?
 
Besides manual web 2.0's and PBN's is there any other way to get quality tier 1 links? The contextuals made by gsa even if you can filter them by PR/DA/TF etc they are spammed to death by other gsa users, pretty much every minute a new post appers on this sites, some have up to 100k posts and because the link juice will be divided to all this links even if they have high PR/DA/TF this sites offers little link juice.
The amount of link juice they pass on to your site doesn't matter because your tier 2 and tier 3 links will provide enough link juice to rank your site (if they don't, build more). If you are still worried, build your tier 1 links manually. That's the best way to build tier 1 links.
 
The amount of link juice they pass on to your site doesn't matter because your tier 2 and tier 3 links will provide enough link juice to rank your site (if they don't, build more). If you are still worried, build your tier 1 links manually. That's the best way to build tier 1 links.
So even if they are spammed i will get some juice, the only difference is that i will get less than from websites with less posts/external links. Is that right?

Besides web 2.0s what kind of other manual tier 1 links can i make? (contextuals)
 
Can anyone tell me what the difference between tier 1, 2 and 3 links if they are all linking to your money site?
 
there are different ways or i can say infinite ways for building your tier scheme https://www.google.com/search?q=typ...HI3sateVgvAB&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAg&biw=1366&bih=639 a simple google search can help sometimes . and as far connecting tier 3 to tier 1 then there will be no difference between tier 2 and 3 . well while building tier's the most important thing is anchor text diversity , try to use more generic anchors while making tier 1 .
 
Last edited:
:1: Dont get it mixed up Jane, T1 to MS, T2 to T1 and T3 to T2. U can draw the crazy diagram urself . T1 is to juice up your MS, 2.0 mainly use for diversity while u target the exact match with PBN. Use the T2 to rank the T1 and help them index. T3 is just there to help the T2 index

That diagram u got is not a 3 tier setup, its a 2 tier setup
 
:1: Dont get it mixed up Jane, T1 to MS, T2 to T1 and T3 to T2. U can draw the crazy diagram urself . T1 is to juice up your MS, 2.0 mainly use for diversity while u target the exact match with PBN. Use the T2 to rank the T1 and help them index. T3 is just there to help the T2 index

Thanks, but it is confusing when I get other people telling me to NOT interlink them and then when I ask about what to do with them, I don't get a reply :(

Thanks you for your help anyway.
 
On your diagram, the T2 links are web2.0 profiles and social bookmark and they're linking to each other << this is what they mean as interlinking.

What they mean by not interlinking is to point the T2 only to T1 instead of T2 pointing to each other and T1 as ur diagram suggest. Personally i don't see interlinking things on T2 level as a problem..
 
Last edited:
On your diagram, the T2 links are web2.0 profiles and social bookmark and they're linking to each other << this is what they mean as interlinking.

What they mean by not interlinking is to point the T2 only to T1 instead of T2 pointing to each other and T1 as ur diagram suggest. Personally i don't see interlinking things on T2 level as a problem..

Ah cool. The person who compiled that diagram really confused me as they'd labelled the 2 nearest profiles as T2 and the further away web 2.0 profiles as T3 if you look closely on the diagram.
 
For your tier 1 links, make sure you have control to edit the content. In case Google penalty, you can always edit the links out and your money site will be clear.
 
OP that's the answer but I would recommend to put a bit medium quality web 2.0s for tier 2. You can make use of magic submitter.

Tier 1 (Web 2.0) <- GSA spam (contextual only) <- GSA/Scrapebox (Every platform and link possible) <- Link Indexing Service (First Pass with GSA Indexer and Second pass with an online service)
 
Not to try to confuse you, but these days many say to link each T2's to more than 1 T1's. That's just to prevent the work going down the drain when one of the T1 links are broken.
 
Keep it simple. Big diagrams or Big Mega Blasts campaigns in Senuke Now Not Work in 2015 strategies. Keep it as simple as Possible.
 
For your tier 1 links, make sure you have control to edit the content. In case Google penalty, you can always edit the links out and your money site will be clear.

If you get penalized you're doing something wrong.
 
It is a really bad diagram, and is best ignored. And I don't agree with the comment to link each T2 to more than one T1 just in case a link is broken. If a link is broken and you can't repair it, just build more links.
 
Back
Top