Which is more responsive, facebook or twitter?
- Thread starter delnabo
- Start date
m0g0l
BANNED
- Sep 8, 2010
- 224
- 11,328
if for fast and quick short span of time. then facebook.
Rajthepositivelife
Elite Member
- Feb 9, 2010
- 1,960
- 481
Since past few months, a lot of Internet Marketers have noticed that fb is more responsive as compared to twitter.
For my own sites, I find that a person coming from fb on my site spends at least more than 30% of time spent by people coming from twitter
For my own sites, I find that a person coming from fb on my site spends at least more than 30% of time spent by people coming from twitter
BufferOver
Senior Member
- Mar 4, 2009
- 1,187
- 264
Facebook is much more harder to get in this days. Friends adding don't work, they will ban you. For me Twitter is much more simple and easy
Checkmate
BANNED
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,658
- 687
Not recently, Twitter @mentioning is dying.
sirgold
BANNED
- Jun 25, 2010
- 1,260
- 649
Twitter is way simpler therefore this comes with the evident downside of being more exposed to trivial spamming... FB on the other hand allows you to create fan pages, groups, events and code your own apps that can go viral with a bit of luck and on a good day generate way more per app than you can ever dream of with twitter...
People use Twitter wrong, that's why. I have 7300+ niche followers on twitter than all retweet and @ me all of the time because I give them quality links to my sites articles and they care about them.
If you're being legit, Twitter is a fantastic tool, also the fact I follow very few people and have that many followers also means that it helps to boost my SERP massively, as we know twitter accounts with a lot of weight directly contribute to SERP.
If you're being legit, Twitter is a fantastic tool, also the fact I follow very few people and have that many followers also means that it helps to boost my SERP massively, as we know twitter accounts with a lot of weight directly contribute to SERP.
