Which Article Submitter Best ?

those are just wishes.... its up to you to prioritize your backlog of features. I suppose i should post them on your forum though


No problem. I like AMR the way it is but then again, some people want new stuff. I'm currently rockin the serps with AMR..
 
No problem. I like AMR the way it is but then again, some people want new stuff. I'm currently rockin the serps with AMR..
would you be willing to tell us what strategy you use? if not here email it to your paying customers so only we get to see it :D
 
yep a one time price for AMR is a steal.. cant go wrong with that.
 
UAW is superior when it comes to readability but the downside is.. it will only spin 3 articles with 4-6 paragraph each...
 
alright so whats your HONEST review on AMR regardless if the author of the program is here.

What if he wasnt here, what would you say about the software. HONEST OPINION
 
I have tried many products and still use a few. AMR kills! SEnuke. Here is a example. I threw up a article and didn't spin it, used a gmail account and it was published 287 times. You can use LiveLink and get HTML, CSV or better a RSS -XML output.

This was spending about 30 minutes reading some instructions and just doing this as a test. You can turned out hundreds of articles very quickly. I will use a real email address and a spun article next time.

Absolutely awesome job by Sniper (what is a little creepy is the avatar), I assumed you ere a dude.

DV
 
I bought AMR yesterday and have been putting it to the test. So far I think it's a killer product and wish I had purchased it long ago. I compare it to getting the best piece of a$$ I ever had. Very satisfying. lol

One of the main features I really like is the thesaurus. Makes for very good spinning.
 
I bought AMR and submitted three articles a week ago...Not one article has been published.
 
I highly doubt that it's AMR's fault. Were they well written articles, were they submitted to high PR sites? If so they are a little harder to get approval.

I bought the software yesterday (Saturday - the weekend), only submitted about 200 so far and I've already some of them published. So there must be something wrong with the way the article is written or maybe you missed some steps in setting it up.

It has some very helpful video tutorials if you already haven't looked at them.
 
I submitted the same articles to ezine and article base without any issues. I followed the videos. Email was confirmed, I submitted, but not one was published. I can understand the red ones, but the greens are still unpublished almost ten days later.
 
What could be the cause of that?


I submitted the same articles to ezine and article base without any issues. I followed the videos. Email was confirmed, I submitted, but not one was published. I can understand the red ones, but the greens are still unpublished almost ten days later.
 
Absolutely awesome job by Sniper (what is a little creepy is the avatar), I assumed you ere a dude.

DV
That's just one of Sniper's gfs :D
I submitted the same articles to ezine and article base without any issues. I followed the videos. Email was confirmed, I submitted, but not one was published. I can understand the red ones, but the greens are still unpublished almost ten days later.
Just because you send an article doesn't mean that it will get published.

What I have come to find out is that a lot of times the reason it doesn't get published is because I didn't pick a category for the article that the directories have.

So what you do is resubmit it to investigate what the problem is

1. Re-submit the same article that didn't get published with no changes to 1 site (for example articlesbase.com)
2. If you didn't change anything in the article it will fail again (we want to find out the reason why it failed). Now click the "result" button which will take you the article you just tried to submit
3. There you will find out the reason why it failed. Like I said doing this myself I have find out that I didn't pick the right categories for my articles.

Use the result feature to find out what's going on with your articles and resubmit them once you find the solution. It's also a good thing to read the policies of ezine,articlesbase and all the big directories to make sure you write articles that they will publish by meeting all their requirements.
 
Isn't the point of the tool to minimize manual input?

If my articles were accepted in the stricter sites and I submit them using AMR, then shouldn't one of them at least be published?

What's the point of checking results on 100% of my failed submission? That defeats the whole purpose of using a tool. While I did check some of them, it still didn't give me a clear indication as to why it was not published.

I used unique articles that were professionally written and the results were the same.

I also tried re-submitting a few days later.

I guess my point is that if I write an article and submit them, shouldn't I get at least 10% published? I shouldn't have to check them all the time because they didn't get published.

Otherwise, why not just do it manually.
 
Although the customerhandling of Sniper is below average, the software he has produced is definitely not. I've used the trial and I'm more than satisfied with what it does. Will do some more testing and perhaps send a few questions, but it definitely works and I will buy it in the near future.

Nice job on your product, Sniper.
 
Back
Top