What would be better?
- Thread starter hazzi
- Start date
-
- Tags
- game development
- Dec 5, 2019
- 331
- 226
Youd need to think in advantages and disadvantages
Doing it yourself is cheaper, but slower because you need to learn to do averything yourself
Having a team to do it for you is more expensive, but maybe they know what they're doing and maybe they'll have a more aesthetic result
Doing it yourself is cheaper, but slower because you need to learn to do averything yourself
Having a team to do it for you is more expensive, but maybe they know what they're doing and maybe they'll have a more aesthetic result
xReminisce
Elite Member
- Dec 29, 2012
- 7,331
- 36,781
Depends on many factors
As it seems that you are not proficient in the coding the games.
It would depend on the time restraint you have instead.
- How confident are you to learn the language in x amount of time? Is it possible to wait
- How confident are you finding a decent dev team
If you are short on time, I would recommend finding a dev team as (unless your games ain't going to have updates) it would be a constant amount of work.
Bug / error fixing, updates etc etc. + New Games.
- Oct 31, 2021
- 557
- 1,006
Totally agree
hazzi
Senior Member
- Apr 1, 2017
- 936
- 291
I have decided to learn to code using unity, i simply have to put in the time.
- Nov 16, 2011
- 19,789
- 11,280
If you have money, hire team. Otherwise, you know that you got only one option.
hazzi
Senior Member
- Apr 1, 2017
- 936
- 291
but if i learn to code i can soft launch a game for example with 50 levels to see the metrics . That would be cheaper since i can reuse assets to do many soft launches.
- Mar 27, 2020
- 1,653
- 667
I'm not into dev games!
Yes, you can start your game with a minimal version and improve it according to your metrics.
If you're really determined to learn how to code, you'll benefit a lot from this skill in many areas.
You'll need also to market your game correctly