There are so many anti-detect browsers at a less expensive price, but I am not sure whether they will work for your purpose or not. One good thing is that the "less expensive" browsers offer free test profiles. Test them one by one and stick with the one that performs better. Good luckyeah, good idea, but it is quite expensive for me![]()
It's possible to use extensions to generate canvas as well. I never studied anti-detect browsers but seems they use the same technique - launch a browser with extensions.You risking all the accounts to have the same system information, thus putting all the accounts at risk cause you dont have a unique canvas for each account. At current, you get banned quite quickly when having multiple accounts created from the same system, even if you use a VPN that i wont suggest, due to multiple people using it and also its DC IP.
True, however those generated canvas is more unreliable than anything. Besides, it still leaks a few core details. Ill gladly share my knowledge on this with you, cause i used custom, Bas, multiple software to see what is viable to create and maintain accounts not being detected, and the best is to use a software based system (that you can create and have the local core profiles on your system) that has those unique identifiable canvas and fingerprints that can be verified with multiple detection systems, and pass without an issue (also depends on your proxy, it plays a good part also). When you want to use the accounts again, you call the profiled account that will then have the exact same details as to the first time you used it, including the cookies and sessions thereof. Using plugins... they cannot do what software based systems can do.It's possible to use extensions to generate canvas as well. I never studied anti-detect browsers but seems they use the same technique - launch a browser with extensions.
The main problem of the software like BAS, Zennoposter etc., they use custom browsers based on Chromium and it can be detected because they don't have Chrome API. Google removed it 2 yars ago.True, however those generated canvas is more unreliable than anything. Besides, it still leaks a few core details. Ill gladly share my knowledge on this with you, cause i used custom, Bas, multiple software to see what is viable to create and maintain accounts not being detected, and the best is to use a software based system (that you can create and have the local core profiles on your system) that has those unique identifiable canvas and fingerprints that can be verified with multiple detection systems, and pass without an issue (also depends on your proxy, it plays a good part also). When you want to use the accounts again, you call the profiled account that will then have the exact same details as to the first time you used it, including the cookies and sessions thereof. Using plugins... they cannot do what software based systems can do.
I have used Multilogin, Dolphin anty, Incognition. ads power.Thank you. Have you used any yet?
me too, I also feels like that. I was checked all site like iphey, browserleaks,pixelscan and they don't have suspicious point.I think Hidemium's fingerprint is so good, I was tested and WebRTC no leak, this is important thing, and others fingerprint like WebGL, Canvas,... feels like a real browser
BAS Fingerprints are the worst you can get, they have limited "real" ones, and its shared by thousands of users. So the chances that the Fingerprint you are getting from them has already been profiled by the target website you are working with. I used them when i created automation systems via Bas, end of the day ill rather work with a different software that generates and creates the local profile that can be recalled when working with the accounts again. Unless you only using it for a once off, then sure, Bass fingerprints could work, but high risk that thousands of people had also used the same fingerprint is high, very high.I tried fingerprints.bablosoft and it works for headless chrome.
You're right. I disabled fingerprints cause they caused detection problems. I use it only for headless chrome now where puppeteer extra stealth fails lately. lolBAS Fingerprints are the worst you can get, they have limited "real" ones, and its shared by thousands of users. So the chances that the Fingerprint you are getting from them has already been profiled by the target website you are working with. I used them when i created automation systems via Bas, end of the day ill rather work with a different software that generates and creates the local profile that can be recalled when working with the accounts again. Unless you only using it for a once off, then sure, Bass fingerprints could work, but high risk that thousands of people had also used the same fingerprint is high, very high.
SeleniumYou're right. I disabled fingerprints cause they caused detection problems. I use it only for headless chrome now where puppeteer extra stealth fails lately. lol