What are your thoughts on using AI-generated content for money sites
- Thread starter Eedita
- Start date
- May 14, 2023
- 3,916
- 3,911
A handy assistant, nothing more.
Mixing AI draft with human editing can be safe, it will depends on how much edit we are talking about
Mixing AI draft with human editing can be safe, it will depends on how much edit we are talking about
olahabeeb2006
Registered Member
- Jul 3, 2025
- 89
- 17
I don't really believe it's possible, and if it's possible, it will be very hard
- Nov 17, 2022
- 488
- 706
These 4 words should be banned on BHW.
Last time I hired someone to write content was pre-chatGPT era. Also, I print content more than ever.
hideath
Elite Member
- Jun 16, 2019
- 6,620
- 7,350
It would be safer and cheaper if you just get the best possible output using AI, and hire someone to rewrite the content,
You're stripping the research, outlining, and all of the other steps, and simply minimizing the task for a cheaper quote,
That should work for most cases as long as you deal with the right writer, but it depends on the niche and type of content as well
You're stripping the research, outlining, and all of the other steps, and simply minimizing the task for a cheaper quote,
That should work for most cases as long as you deal with the right writer, but it depends on the niche and type of content as well
Churn SEO LTD
BANNED
- Sep 15, 2024
- 349
- 97
AI-assisted drafts can rank, but only if the final piece is genuinely helpful and well-edited by a human. Google’s update favors people-first content that’s accurate, shows expertise, and delivers real value—not just AI noise. So mixing AI with strong human input is fine, but you must add unique insights, verify facts, and tailor to your audience. If it wouldn’t pass as solid, well-researched human writing, it isn’t “safe.
TOR SEO
Senior Member
- Oct 5, 2021
- 1,060
- 1,152
AI can save huge time and scale content fast but quality, uniqueness, and user value matter most. Search engines reward helpful, well optimized content, not just bulk text. If you’re using AI, always edit, add insights, and keep it natural so it truly helps readers but ye you can give your own touch to looks better
- Feb 28, 2019
- 7,455
- 7,915
You can use one AI to write content and another AI to edit it, so that you can create absolutely no humans involved content that Google always loves to rank.
UnusualSubstance
Elite Member
- Feb 22, 2019
- 2,045
- 22,835
I'm more concerned if you don't use AI.
Loud & Proud Agency
BANNED
- Mar 31, 2025
- 22
- 9
In my experience, blending solid research with a human-edited draft tends to produce content that performs well and stays within safe boundaries
- Nov 11, 2018
- 12,097
- 10,856
Google's third class ai called gemini is ranking 1st position on almost every result. While most other positions are chatgpt which is a superior ai model. So yeah, let google say what it want to say. Our ai is better then Google's ai.
Does google does human editing? You know the answer.
Does google does human editing? You know the answer.
RaveOn Agency
BANNED
- Mar 31, 2025
- 25
- 4
Mixing AI with human editing is usually the sweet spot — AI gives speed, but human refinement ensures depth, originality, and a natural voice. That balance tends to keep content safer under Google’s Helpful Content guidelines.
- Jun 15, 2019
- 8,919
- 4,405
As Long as your content is useful in the search and is providing something unique to the search it doesn't matter if it's AI or not.
seomaster5
Elite Member
- Oct 31, 2021
- 5,161
- 1,482
Don't use AI content. It is very risky. Google does not like such sites .
sushil64846
Registered Member
- Feb 4, 2025
- 95
- 34
They are good to use , I know few are using it for over an year and found no issues and the results are good
