Web 2.0 Creation!!!

Why do you think it is case?

Click to expand...

Scritty said:

No - you are right - manual ones are generally better.
But if you have dozens of URL's you want to link, and each one you would like many 1st tier links and many 2nd and 3rd tier links. Then doing that manually is either;
a) Very time consuming or
b) Very expensive

It'a a matter of scale. 1st tier links should mostly be content based links IMO (not profile links - even if people call the profile "WEB2 profile")
If you have one or two sites and just a handful of URL's within thse sites to promote, OR you are time rich but cash poor....then manual is best for sure. (My biggest thread on this forum is how to create them easily and quickly and manually)

However, if you have many sites or a couple of sites with a lot of content that needs backlinking (as these days you should backlink every major URL within your site) then manual is not really feasible.

I've bought "fiverr" gigs for first tier linking, and they lack either power or vesatility.
Been on WSO and tested some services there, here or traffic planet or wherever.
Any link offer that claims it effectively links one URL for under $50 tends to be below par - at least by my standards - no matter how hard they push the quality of the service.

I create 30+ quality posts or pages on my site network a week (1000 word average 100% unique posts or pages) I'm not spending $1500 a week getting them all power linked by a service with enough quality for my standards or worse, spend hundreds of hours creating links structures to each and every one by hand.
No..I'm going to spend 25 minutes each with an arsenal of good tools and good content and do it right.

To that end - automation comes in. Used entirely differently from the methods from even 6 months ago. Automation is still by far the most cost and time effective way of adding quality diverse links to a large number of URL's.

But if you fill your tools with crap content, don't think about youre linking structure, don't diversify anchor text and platform, go at it to fast or too hard post crap content etc ..you will likely fail these days.
But if someone does that it's THEIR mistakes - not the software.

Scritty

Click to expand...

loboxd said:

Im thinking about getting Ultimate Demon but i heard you need alot of addons and packets? Any help me set it up if i buy it lol?

And i totally agree the tier 1 links should be manual, but some people just dont have the time like me. I have a quality articles and i do about 50 web .20 with each a quality unique article with 1 anchor to my money site, then tier 2-3 are completely different stories.

So right now its either between Magic Submitter Ultimate Demon and ZennoPoster. UD seems to be wining

Click to expand...

phpfail said:

There's absolute nothing wrong with automation, you just need to automate better quality... manual isn't the answer to penguin/panda, better quality is. If you have to go manual for better quality I guess do it then but my seo techniques are still 100% automated (other then setting the bots up) and I've ranked 3 new sites and gotten them to the first page since panda

Click to expand...

webmasterbd said:

Guys what about UD,does anyone been using it here for this purpose with good succes lately?Is it realy worth buying??

Click to expand...