Web 2.0 Creation - quick Qs

R

RBKing

Registered Member

Sep 23, 2012

81

21

• Dec 9, 2013

• #1

I have 6 main keywords I am targeting. I'm creating some Web 2.0s as part of the first tier of my link structure. My questions:

Do I base each Web 2.0 on 1 keyword only?

Or

Do I base each article on 1 keyword and have each Web 2.0 covering multiple keyword articles?

My current plan is to have 2 Web 2.0s per keyword, each with 2-3 articles based on that keyword. So 12 Web 2.0s altogether and ~30 articles covering 6 keywords. How does that sound or am I not understanding it correctly.

Thank you, and any additional advice is appreciated

 

M

motron

Registered Member

Apr 6, 2010

97

27

• Dec 9, 2013

• #2

If the site is one I care about then I take a little different approach. Maybe it is a niche I enjoy and I am trying to create an authority site. If that is the case then I will create Web2.0 sites that also cover the entire niche. That way I am not locked into writing about just one keyword and the Web2.0 can age and increase in PA/DA and I can add additional keywords in the future. Doing this you can create your own private network that can be used on new keywords and new projects.

 

R

RBKing

Registered Member

Sep 23, 2012

81

21

• Dec 9, 2013
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

Much appreciated.

motron said:

If the site is one I care about then I take a little different approach ...

Click to expand...

 

R

RBKing

Registered Member

Sep 23, 2012

81

21

• Dec 9, 2013
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #4

So the best thing to do would be to create 10 quality Web 2.0s with multiple articles focusing on the 6 different keywords, with no Web 2.0 restricted to 1 certain keyword.

 

divok

Senior Member

Jul 21, 2010

1,071

656

• Dec 9, 2013

• #5

1 article per keyword on a single web 2.0 , rest of the content would be bluff . Also you are leaving a huge footprints by only building web2.0 to your money site . Diversify .

 

R

RBKing

Registered Member

Sep 23, 2012

81

21

• Dec 9, 2013
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #6

Thanks for your advice. As mentioned in my first post:

"Web 2.0s as part of the first tier of my link structure"

divok said:

1 article per keyword on a single web 2.0 , rest of the content would be bluff . Also you are leaving a huge footprints by only building web2.0 to your money site . Diversify .

Click to expand...

 

gabriel0270

Regular Member

Nov 13, 2012

204

105

• Dec 9, 2013

• #7

RBKing said:

Thanks for your advice. As mentioned in my first post:

"Web 2.0s as part of the first tier of my link structure"

Click to expand...

What else are you creating?

 

R

RBKing

Registered Member

Sep 23, 2012

81

21

• Dec 9, 2013
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #8

Please see my old link building plan, below:

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...ternet-marketing-plan-ecommerce-store-v2.html

A few things have changed but essentially it's fairly similar.

gabriel0270 said:

What else are you creating?

Click to expand...

 

nishantsarkar

Power Member

Jan 18, 2011

594

145

• Dec 9, 2013

• #9

Well i too have a doubt on this
1. You should concentrate on multiple keywords including you LSI in WEB 2.0 but the thing is if all the web 2.0 article on a single page is directing to a single page of my money site, Am i leaving a huge footprint.
2. If i create different web2.0 accounts overtime for different keywords directing on the same page. how do i create authority on this web2.0 ? Tier 2?

I would really love someone throwing some light to it

 

ilim72

Regular Member

Sep 2, 2010

452

229

• Dec 9, 2013

• #10

I prefer not to focus on one or just few keywords, I think you can have many more options if you widen your content to related niche instead and covering specific keywords in separate posts.

 

Adam718

BANNED

Jun 19, 2012

1,401

699

• Dec 9, 2013

• #11

1 link/anchor per Web 2 is the best approach, because it has the most chance of it being crawled and link juice counted. Also using more than 1 just makes your footprint bigger. 2 should be the absolute maximum if you MUST have 2. Even if you target LSI, 1 keyword is best.