Web 2.0 Creation - quick Qs

I have 6 main keywords I am targeting for various sections of a client website.

I'm creating some Web 2.0s as part of the first tier of my link structure. My questions:

Do I base each Web 2.0 on 1 keyword only. If so, how many Web 2.0s per keyword?

Or

Do I base each article on 1 keyword and have each Web 2.0 covering multiple keywords? If so, how many articles per keyword?

My current plan is to have 2 Web 2.0s per keyword, each with 2-3 articles based on that keyword. So 12 Web 2.0s altogether and ~30 articles covering 6 keywords. How does that sound or am I not understanding it correctly.

Thank you

Man, I really do not know how the hell did you manage to get yourself a client paying for SEO services when you clearly have no clue about the VERY BASICS.

No wonder you get tons of businesses later saying that SEO doesn't work and that it is shit.

Imagine if you break your arm and this guy on the street convinces you that he is a doctor (turns out he is a clown working at a circus), how the fuck would you feel about that? Of course, you will pay him And you will receive clownish medinicine

Thank you, that was very helpful.

Reyone said:

Man, I really do not know how the hell did you manage to ...

Click to expand...

I find between 5 and 15 web 2.0's targeting 1 keyword is best.
There's loads of ways to do things, so some people may disagree but that's what works for me and my clients.

Of course, you still need the generic anchors and naked URLs linking using that first tier, but link out to wikipedia or youtube on the first tiers also.

Hope this helps!

I do not put a single web 2.0 site for just a single keyword. I use at least 2 minimum keywords

should all the articles be original for web 2.0 or we can spin them also?

10everyday said:

should all the articles be original for web 2.0 or we can spin them also?

Click to expand...

Depends on what you want to sow !! If you want to REAP WHAT YOU SOW then its all on you ! But for tier 1 i would strictly go with quality and unique articles.

There isn't going to be a golden rule to follow, so let's say if you create XXX web2.0s this way and than link them to your pages you will get the #1 spot. Don't approach it from this direction.
Instead, consider link building a process by which (if you did it right), your site will eventually get better ranking. You will need to keep doing it, until your site reaches to the desired position.
About web2.0s:
- there is nothing written in stone about how to implement this exactly (since Matt won't tell you how is it valuated, everybody can only guess what's best)
- try to keep this in mind: how to do it in a way it looks the most legit? (this will make them the hardest to detect)

A few tips:
- use proxies, and virtual machines (as it's not just your IP what you give away when you visit a website. You don't want them to know that it's you who is creating other sites)
- they are after relevancy, not a fixed keyword. It means, make them be about your niche in general. Use the same keywords, LSI keywords etc.. but don't overdo it.
- link out to authority sites (like wikipedia) too, so don't create sites having only one link to your site
- keep adding articles for a few more months randomly (it would be pretty easy to realize what you are doing, if you would have exactly 2 web2.0s pointing to each of your pages and all of them having exactly 3 posts.So, make them different, use different templates, different amount of articles, don't only link to your site, but use interlinks etc..)

... and this could go on, but instead, just use your common sense and try to make it in a way it would be hard to detect the purpose of existence of those sites.

I'd base it on what looks more natural - does one web 2.0 covering one keyword seem like it has been put together naturally? Absolutely not - and in a bid to stay on the right side of the next algorithm change I'd try and target several.

Then again I have had success with just using the one keyword as well. I suppose the message I'm trying to give is that if you're building for the future, my advice is to target more than one just to keep the 'natural factor'.

In my view, you can use 1-2 keywords in one web 2.0 site. Your content should 600-700 words.

jeffylo said:

Your content should 600-700 words.

Click to expand...

Not sure you even need to write that much to be honest, as long as it's decent content 400-500 words usually seems ok for me.

I used like 350, 400 and 500 words articles ! All needed is genuine and quality articles.

Link building is a time consuming as well as required hard work.Its a continuous task until you satisfied.I think you have overdo something here.use 5 kW for 1 web 2.0.

Depends on what you want.use at least 2 keywords for each web 2.0. and use unique content for tier 1.