[Web 2.0] Article uniqueness question

Hi there, I have a question to the experts.

When you create a 1st tier backlinks for you money site.

Do you use a unique article for evey single post?

Or e.g. you write 3-5 unique articles and reuse them for 15-25 posts?

Will appriciate if you can share some of your knowladge related to this question.

Thank you in advance.

People do use spun / low quality content still but if you want your money site and web 2.0s to last invest some time into them. Make them actually helpful

Unless it's a churn and burn!

jamie3000 said:

People do use spun / low quality content still but if you want your money site and web 2.0s to last invest some time into them. Make them actually helpful

Unless it's a churn and burn!

Click to expand...

This ^^ but it also depends on the number of properties you have thus also your budget.

Unique or Spun Article both will work but if you want long lasting result then go for unique articles... else there is a chance of web2.0 get deleted for spam

Haven't been using spun content for years now. There are a few providers where you can get $1 a piece articles like @littlewebdragon so why risk it with spun stuff anyway.

Jakudzai said:

Or e.g. you write 3-5 unique articles and reuse them for 15-25 posts?

Click to expand...

15-25 posts is probably overkill. Usually if you do these things for your properties you'll be fine in terms of manual review; more than this is mostly a waste of time:

• Add a brief about page
• Add a brief contact page
• Change the default banner image + set a custom blog title
• Add/remove/adjust the default widgets in the sidebar/footer -- maybe add a short bio or similar
• Add like 3-5 posts (see next section of this post)

Nargil said:

Haven't been using spun content for years now. There are a few providers where you can get $1 a piece articles like @littlewebdragon so why risk it with spun stuff anyway.

Click to expand...

Came here to say basically this. Mixing some things like sharing/reposting other people's images/videos with a brief comment works pretty well, too and is free.

Would note that we're presumably both mainly talking about expired web 2.0s that have existing backlink profiles, where dropping a few dollars on scraped content is a negligible cost.

Since OP did mention:

Jakudzai said:

When you create a 1st tier backlinks for you money site.

Click to expand...

Would infer that these aren't expired web 2.0s.

For fresh properties, the value per web 2.0 / value per backlink is substantially lower. While $1 per article is pretty negligible for a decent expired property, for brand new blogs, you're going to need a lot more properties to move the needle in terms of ranking, so getting expired articles for each is going to hurt your margins much more noticeably.

Honestly, if you're making fresh web 2.0s you should keep your expectations pretty low. It's been a while since I've gotten any decent movement from fresh web 2.0s without putting way, way more effort into them than it's worth (see https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/opportunitycost.asp). Normally I would recommend focusing your time elsewhere; if you're brand new to SEO, then you might go for it anyway. Fresh web 2.0s are a free, easy, and basically risk-free way to start experimenting with link building.

Write unique articles for each post

Better unique so they get indexed and have value, also better readable articles so the web2.0 properties stick and don't get deleted by admins.