catonkeyboard
Regular Member
- Dec 7, 2011
- 273
- 172
thanks for letting us know 
WARNING: DO NOT Blast your Buffer Sites!
- Thread starter Smart SEO
- Start date
Expertpeon
Elite Member
- Apr 22, 2011
- 1,959
- 1,198
If by working you mean, basically no SERP increase then yes.
kvmcable
Supreme Member
- Dec 28, 2010
- 1,354
- 2,823
Xrumer is vastly different than running a SB nofollow campaign
Xrumer works, especially through buffer 301 sites...
The best part about going that route is: it's cheap and it's extremely easy to produce HQ lists. I made a 40,000 forum list (that had threads/posts stick after 7 days) in about 24 hours... and a 80-90k forum profile list in the same time period.
That could take a fresh site to the top of a whole lot of niches.
Right, proper Xrumer execution moves your shit forward. Proper SB blasts moves your competitors backwards. Don't confuse the two and welcome to SEO 2012.
Ghoast
Power Member
- Nov 17, 2009
- 573
- 701
Xrumer is vastly different than running a SB nofollow campaign
Xrumer works, especially through buffer 301 sites...
The best part about going that route is: it's cheap and it's extremely easy to produce HQ lists. I made a 40,000 forum list (that had threads/posts stick after 7 days) in about 24 hours... and a 80-90k forum profile list in the same time period.
That could take a fresh site to the top of a whole lot of niches.
Hey - not to highjack the thread but are you serious about Xrumer blasts at 301 redirects? This could very well be the next thing I will add to my link building arsenal..
You think G hasn't caught on to spamming 301s yet? What's the deal? It sounds like an absolutely fantastic idea.. any dos and dont's?
Sorry if this is hijacking thread OP - it's on similar lines though, no?
Expertpeon
Elite Member
- Apr 22, 2011
- 1,959
- 1,198
I started a thread about it, that reached around 10 pages... we analyzed a host of sites doing just the above, all of them are still ranking.
DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
Welcome to 5 years ago.
Yes it works, yes it also works just as well straight to your money site (whoever says it doesn't has either not tried it or has no idea how to do it properly), and yes, there are filters in place for both ways, straight, and 301.
ohaider
Senior Member
- Jul 28, 2011
- 819
- 428
I have continually done this and have only seen my ranking rise. I use extremely high quality spun content (word, phrase, sentence, paragraph) and manage to pull 100% unique content on each web 2.0. Keep the quality high and blast with high quality links and you'll be fine. I have my own personal lists that are segregated to >100 OBL and PR>1. They work perfectly.
Last edited:
Expertpeon
Elite Member
- Apr 22, 2011
- 1,959
- 1,198
Truly, I have seen only modest use of this technique, relegated to some of the best SEOers out there generally in the last few years... people were interested in building authority sites in 2011, but google has already changed that this year.
This is why you're seeing it again, the good and bad users of Xrumer... hopefully I'm a good one? I'm testing the technique on a site that's about a mth old that I generated some awesome link pyramids to and which is already ranking well on a highly comp term...
I've seen a host of sites ranking for at least 2 months this way... sounds a lot better than trying to build an authority site again!
301s seem to last longer, especially if done properly
gamemerlin
Junior Member
- May 22, 2009
- 134
- 10
Do u use paid version of senuke or cracked, is there a cracked version for both i can get as mkst of my income got screwed and i cant afford to buy licenses now
- Jul 15, 2011
- 188
- 31
I do not see this as possible, then every wordpress post would be a targer since it's pinged at pingomatic by default.
I think the issue here is that a lot of 2.0 properties are getting severely devalued or nixed by G just like the private blog networks. If there are more spam blogs/posts than real users it will happen sooner or later. It's not a new trend. It started long ago with free hosts. These really are no different.
forestgump
Newbie
- Sep 12, 2009
- 13
- 0
Thanks for the info.
ComputerEngineer
Senior Member
- Apr 25, 2012
- 844
- 71
Well i can say google did good job on this occasion. I mean your case not the whole updates.
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
So is this idea pyramid:
- May 1, 2010
- 2,442
- 470
Lets suppose i use 10 web 2.0s as tier 1 and 20 web 2.0s as tier2. Tier 3 would be AMR, wikis and xrumer
So should i then blast tier1 using xrumer and then use scrapebox blast on xrumer links.
Or do this starting with layer2?
So should i then blast tier1 using xrumer and then use scrapebox blast on xrumer links.
Or do this starting with layer2?
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Any product used badly can destroy your site
Any product used well can give you great benefit.
I've had fantastic results with scrapebox - but posting generic rubbish to 500,000 spam filled AA sites is not how it works.
Scraping high PR sites with low OBL and posting a few thousand well thought out comments using the slow poster on sites that maybe also require a captcha solve as well.
That's working like a frikking champion for me.
None of my WEB2.0 that have had this done have done anything but improve
250 great links on good sites > than 250,000 shitty links every time. And scrapebox used well is well capable of the former - even if most people use it for the latter.
Scritty
