Using 100% Ai content on Web 2.0s - Good or Bad

Ocke86

BANNED
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
255
Reaction score
143
What do you guys think about using 100% Ai content on Web 2.0s (articles) as Tier 1s, good or a bad idea and do you have any experience from doing that ?

Appreciate all the answers regarding this
 
Hey buddy!

AI content is useful if it has at least basic human touch . What ever the forums or sites you will plan to publish your content , if it's 100% AI then it has risk to get spam or below impression by the audience. So, consider to re-phrase the content to proceed.
 
What do you guys think about using 100% Ai content on Web 2.0s (articles) as Tier 1s, good or a bad idea and do you have any experience from doing that ?
I'll at least edit it a bit and recheck since it's for Tier 1
 
Just forget about it mate, Yes you will get ranked on google maybe in the first 3, but after google finish studying your website, you will get down.

the solution is write AI content, but your touch is IMPORTANT
 
Just forget about it mate, Yes you will get ranked on google maybe in the first 3, but after google finish studying your website, you will get down.

the solution is write AI content, but your touch is IMPORTANT

He's talking about Web 2.0's, not direct money sites. Fully AI is fine.
 
Great, thanks for all the answers =), i give it a go
 
Would you say its possible to use to many (good) web 2.0s aimed at one website, for example if i have a site with 4000 pillar post pages, and i aim at directing 10-20 web 2.0s with ai content to each page (as tier 1) is that reasonable or a waste of time?
 
AI content is good enough for this kind of backlinks
 
if it's made with really good AI, so no problems
i like it
but if it was made using awful ai, where photo looks like child has drawn it, i hate it
 
Back
Top