Nash Commerce
Regular Member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 537
- 858
Anyone thought of using web2.0 as money site due to the existing DA and quick indexation?
sounds good in theory, any downsides?
sounds good in theory, any downsides?
Use web2.0 as money site... hmm
- Thread starter Nash Commerce
- Start date
D
Deleted member 708208
Guest
Well, you need your own domain so it's going to have 0 authority regardless. 
Nash Commerce
Regular Member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 537
- 858
Well, you need your own domain so it's going to have 0 authority regardless.
no you use the domain they give you for free. it has very high da.
that was just the idea in my head.
TheDankChocolate
Power Member
- Jul 9, 2020
- 632
- 497
Quick indexation? Which web 2.0 are you using?
Grosvenor-Salois
Newbie
- Jul 6, 2021
- 30
- 9
share your experience after trying it.
- May 2, 2010
- 8,060
- 12,969
I wouldn't have the guts, in case they deleted the account. At least with a website, it's almost concrete so you don't have that problem.
I think the risk would be reduced for wordpress and wix, as those are the biggest free sites.
I think the risk would be reduced for wordpress and wix, as those are the biggest free sites.
worldelite
Regular Member
- Jan 16, 2010
- 250
- 61
a lot of amateurs use web 2.0 as money site, however using pro plan = theme + custom domain linked to ns of web 2.0 provider - but its made only with one reason - luck of experience in web development
cons: you dont control your site for 100% and there is no such customization as you can do with your own hosted site
cons: you dont control your site for 100% and there is no such customization as you can do with your own hosted site
Is it possible to use advertising networks to earn money when this blog gets good traffic? Or they are no longer accepted because Adsense does not accept them.
- Jun 16, 2019
- 6,344
- 6,957
Web 2.0s do not have any actual advantage over newly created websites actually,
They're basically treated just a separate and new created ones or even worse,
Nowadays some of them do get indexed hardly even with really HQ content and good design
The last thing to consider is that you should give yourself a favour and stop relying on stupid metrics, especially the Moz ones
They're basically treated just a separate and new created ones or even worse,
Nowadays some of them do get indexed hardly even with really HQ content and good design
The last thing to consider is that you should give yourself a favour and stop relying on stupid metrics, especially the Moz ones
wannabieboy
Junior Member
- Aug 23, 2017
- 105
- 37
I would have a new domains instead of using web2.0s as money sites. You have more control over your domains and also web2.0s tends to get deleted if they find anything suspicious.
- Nov 8, 2009
- 8,844
- 9,129
I swear sometimes these threads are like stepping back 5 years. People who haven't been in SEO for 12 months are answering questions - so weird.
OP, I think the word you're looking for is parasites and unlike what @hideath said, there is an advantage to them. Medium used to work really well for this. There are still a few platforms that work but obviously a lot are cracking down on welcoming the spam. However, I know at least 5 well-known members on here who have made a small fortune off them but I don't think any are active on here anymore.
@Panther28 - You've been here as long as me, surely there are some juicy parasite threads in Exec or is it still dead in there?
@Nash Commerce - Your thinking is solid. Ignore 90% of these replies. Keep going. Def good thinking for a member who joined last year. Parasites are very churn and burn but don't let that scare you off.
I generally find what others are using for parasites then copy (testing the one below currently, not mine, just one a friend sent me). You can also ask in some of the more advanced SEO groups and hope someone will answer but it's unlikely.
OP, I think the word you're looking for is parasites and unlike what @hideath said, there is an advantage to them. Medium used to work really well for this. There are still a few platforms that work but obviously a lot are cracking down on welcoming the spam. However, I know at least 5 well-known members on here who have made a small fortune off them but I don't think any are active on here anymore.
@Panther28 - You've been here as long as me, surely there are some juicy parasite threads in Exec or is it still dead in there?
@Nash Commerce - Your thinking is solid. Ignore 90% of these replies. Keep going. Def good thinking for a member who joined last year. Parasites are very churn and burn but don't let that scare you off.
I generally find what others are using for parasites then copy (testing the one below currently, not mine, just one a friend sent me). You can also ask in some of the more advanced SEO groups and hope someone will answer but it's unlikely.
- Mar 21, 2013
- 23,978
- 30,507
Well yea but you don't own web 2.0's so the money stream can go just like that.
Nash Commerce
Regular Member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 537
- 858
Thanks for your reply, very helpful.
I originally joined in 2014 with my og account but it got hacked /:
fb3003
Elite Member
- Aug 14, 2015
- 5,013
- 3,495
@Nash Commerce - now that you have heard everyone's thinking on this, what are you going to decide?
one bit of advice: search for different keywords that you are interested in, and see if you see any web 2.0 in top 20 search results. you probably won't find any. so that should tell you something
one bit of advice: search for different keywords that you are interested in, and see if you see any web 2.0 in top 20 search results. you probably won't find any. so that should tell you something
- Dec 13, 2020
- 424
- 249
Yeah but was he refering to parasites or churn and burn? I think he was refering to affiliate blogs/ecommerces etc, and in that case own domain is best