Fair enough, but the wording you used was pretty ambiguous.
in the same comment you said "There almost never is one solution to any problem, sometimes there are even multitudes" and "Unless we manage to destroy most of the planet and go towards a dystopian future... some kind of UBI will surely need to be implemented just for the sake of keeping social peace."
I think the first comment is right and the second one might be right but probably not. There are lots of solutions and I don't think that UBI will be the only way that within the context of employment displacement from AI we can keep social peace.
It will likely be the fastest used attempted solution though, but I think there will be potentially pretty catastrophic outcomes from it.
You are right and I apologize for my wording. Explaining things is usually not my strength. I also have a tendency to assume people know what I mean and then I realize they don't. One more reason is that English is not my main language. It's not an excuse, but it is a factor.
UBI will surely be one form of dealing with the job loss crisis. I repeat, I never said it will be the only one solution. It does not mean people will be out of work. It may just mean that AIs will do all the work we dread... giving us the opportunity to do the work we would like to do. Whether we are paid for it or not.
There will be (already are) surpluses created by AI. A lot of those. The only question is whether you want to leave all of that to the elites or get a cut of it (in the form of UBI).
I hope the above also very briefly explains the economic logic of UBI in regards to AI @
andyframpton.
It is entirely my problem but replies like these do raise my temperature:
You do realize that lawyers have lots of money, and that many politicians are/were lawyers?
What does this have to do with anything??? I gave you a whole schemantic that you will have a real hard time finding anywhere because it's proprietary and you respond if I know lawyers are politicians? You know who else are politicians? Plumbers, waiters, chauffeurs, teachers, stonemasons... [insert your any other profession here]. The following formula is always correct:
corporations > politics
And right now corporations all around the globe are investing in AI. What do you think the policies are gonna look like?
And even if completely disregard the policies... you can absolutely and in no way stop the development of AI, even if you place a personal dictator in every town of your country, in all the countries of the world.
You have no knowledge of AI and what it can do as is evidenced by your replies.
None of those jobs are going to be replaced by AI, especially not lawyers.
Confidence without clarity is a very stupid idea. You seem to be very confident in making predictions and assumptions about a technology you have no knowledge of.
How do I know this?
AI is already making money for me and replaced the need for me to work in order to survive. Probably for the rest of my life. In essence I am getting an UBI if you will allow me to say it. Only difference here is that I was personally involved in making this happen and did not wait for the government to provide it for me. I know first hand what AI can do and so I sincerely hope that the economic excesses get divided between people in the form of an UBI. Else, as I said, it will be distributed among the elites. As it is done since decades. AI managed hedge funds consistently outperform human ones. AI can even analyze sentiment and change strategies on the fly.
The problem here is that so many people are buying and believing the narrative that the lobbies are pushing out. And here again we have a classic and stupid response that is brought forth by the elites and absorbed by the sheep:
Just will create more lazy people and cripple the economy.
NO. Absolutely NO. UBI can take care of your survival mode and free your mind and time to do much better things and things that you perhaps actually enjoy doing. Wouldn't that be something? Isn't the wish of financial freedom the reason you joined this forum? Majority of people will be like this. And those people wgi choose to do nothing... horray! We need diversity, we need variety... and well guess what, with an already shattered planet that we created, doing nothing might in many many cases be much better than doing something.
The longer UBI is held back, the more the elites will grab for themselves.
So I am pushing this PRO UBI narrative here. Perhaps there will be one or two people who will listen. Others are way too proud and will disagree just to satisfy their ego... so that they are the ones who have the last response and "be right". However, I know it is akin to telling my dog that he should not eat every crap he sees when I take him out for a walk. There is plenty of food at home. He gets it and will continue to get delicious food to the table every day. But he will still eat all the dung he can find.
It pisses me off when someone is ignorant of a reality that I am already living. And then this random guy on the internet says it's not possible.
In any case, I also apologize for the harsh words that I said to ExperimentalSEO and CoderFromHell in this response. It was said on the premise of good faith. Tough love is what I hope you will get out of this as I sincerely wish you the best and hope you will find a spark of humility and interest to maybe reconsider your stance. If not, than that is fine with me. The message was well intended. What you gather from it is your own personal choice. I have nothing to gain from this.
In any case I am leaving this conversation as I learned not to waste energy and time where in an ambient of disagreement. Time and energy should always be directed towards maximum impact and efficiency. AI may bring us ample money, but time is limited. Hitting a brick wall every step of the way is not a good use of my time.
Best wishes to all of you.