unique content is not king (tested)

BassTrackerBoats said:

So that is why you just left me a false iTrader?

We have NEVER done business together.

Click to expand...

False iTrader? That's gotta be against the rules or something...

- A

Sure it can work especially with news stories that are almost exactly the same, but I wouldn't sleep well at night knowing that all I am doing is building a false foundation for my business. Real content that is unique shines when it is shared and engages people. Why settle for $300 when you can make so much more?

You have to worry about copyright headaches or Google's change of the week.

cgpa2.17 said:

you're weird, I know you're making 30k a month, but out there there r still many r just start to do IM, stop being cocky u asshole..

Click to expand...

Abusing reputed members here will get more heat in your ass .. And you won't last long here.. So be polite in your posts.

You are so contradicting yourself...

You rank higher than the site you copied it from because you got it indexed before they did...according to google it thinks yours is the first and unique article but theirs is not so you rank higher so how can you say unique content is not king when you ranked higher because you were the first? Have you copied their article after it got indexed and then did you rank higher? i don't think you have tried...

oh and when you spun content properly you make it unique...

Spun content can be pretty unique.

BassTrackerBoats said:

So that is why you just left me a false iTrader?

We have NEVER done business together.

Click to expand...

" asshole plus plus asshole plus plus" this is his itrader comment in BTB, 99% sure he is just abusing it. I have reported this. Hopefully i am not the next victim.

I use google a lot... Search for tons of stuff... dont see much spun or even poorly written content. In fact. I NEVER see any spun content.

Sure you're making a little cash right now..

but at some point Google will get round to penalizing spun content and then you'll be making nothing while those of us that use real content to make real money will still be smiling and raking in the dough.

Not only is HQ Unique Content King, it's more like the Emperor nowadays

BassTrackerBoats said:

So that is why you just left me a false iTrader?

We have NEVER done business together.

Click to expand...

Some people can't take criticism. Unfortunately what he doesn't realize is this will have almost no effect on you what so ever but will make him look very bad.

If its gonna use in the Tier 2 or 3 then i have nothing to say.But for tier 1 it would become a nightmare indeed.

cgpa2.17 said:

you're weird, I know you're making 30k a month, but out there there r still many r just start to do IM, stop being cocky u asshole..

Click to expand...

The only asshole in this thread appears to be YOU.

BTB's was just trying to highlight that $300 PM with pure BH low quality content/spam methods is NOTHING to get excited about.
He wasn't knocking you but trying to hint that if you add a little quality then maybe you might improve your revenue considerably.

If you have 10+ spam sites each making $300+ then fair enough but starting a thread titled "unique content is not king (tested)" just makes you look a CLOWN.

Oh and if you are giving people -iTrader because they don't agree with you then that is a pretty douchey move.

OP is correct, I've done this too but not to make money, just to test out how things really work. Once Google sees that you have a lot of fresh content they will post it above another site that has poor onsite optimization. The trick is to let Google see all of your fresh content and the old content database, then they start to trust you and will give you some views. Google prefers fresh over unique.

kegnum said:

I use google a lot... Search for tons of stuff... dont see much spun or even poorly written content. In fact. I NEVER see any spun content.

Click to expand...

Maybe you "never" see spun content because you don't know how to identify it? I use google a lot as well, and I've seen tons of spun content.

The thing people don't want to talk about, is the fact that it can be virtually impossible to identify a well done spin. Like the spins I do take about 40-50 hours to write. You can't tell from reading 1 article on my site that my articles are spun. You have to read about 10-20+ pages before you start to notice that many of the pages talk about the same basic topics, just worded differently.

I'll even give you an example. This is not my site but its the same level of quality that I do my spins. Reverse the letters and go find this site: moc.dlomsseltopsyletulosba.www

When your on the home page scroll down the navigation menu to the page that says "structural mold remediation". Click on that page. Now scroll down all the way to the bottom of the site and you'll see about 400 links to geotargeted pages (ftr I do not stuff links like that on my own sites). But go click on just 1 of those pages and read the content.

If you found 1 of those pages searching directly through Google, you would have NO IDEA that the page was spun.

But if you enter the site through the home page, and find all those links, you immediately notice something fishy is going on. And if you read just 5-10 pages, you'll notice that every single one of those pages is spun. This is what I mean about well spun content being almost impossible to identify.

I have a list of more than 40 sites like that (took me like 2 weeks to find them). And I monitor their rankings because I do the same thing on most of my local sites. It beefs the sites up, makes them huge, makes them authoritative, and they rank like little monsters. Some of these sites I've been tracking for more than 5 years. And the high majority of them dominate for their respective niches long term. These aren't "rank and bank" type sites. These are sites that completely crush their competition and rank for years and years.

So there ARE lots of websites out there with spun content. And if you know how to use it properly you can make a lot of money.

wikihow use and google make them on top I see tutorial stole from some local school as i remember .
anyway google don't care about contents quality they just scaring new webmasters about fake contents is the king story .
Last I never use spun contents because it like stealing someone else hard work.

BreaknBrix said:

Maybe you "never" see spun content because you don't know how to identify it? I use google a lot as well, and I've seen tons of spun content.

The thing people don't want to talk about, is the fact that it can be virtually impossible to identify a well done spin. Like the spins I do take about 40-50 hours to write. You can't tell from reading 1 article on my site that my articles are spun. You have to read about 10-20+ pages before you start to notice that many of the pages talk about the same basic topics, just worded differently.

Click to expand...

I'll give you that. If you are taking that much time to spin an article, you are probably doing a pretty goo job of making it readable. Although if you are spending that much time spinning, you may as well write original content. You are taking a pretty big risk and not saving that much time. But maybe I am wrong. Maybe Google will never be able to catch you and it is all well worth it.

mainceaft said:

wikihow use and google make them on top I see tutorial stole from some local school as i remember .
anyway google don't care about contents quality they just scaring new webmasters about fake contents is the king story .
Last I never use spun contents because it like stealing someone else hard work.

Click to expand...

If you spin your own content it's not stealing.

Op you are making $300/month then be happy with it.but you need to learn basics first.


unique content is king.

try to copy already indexed articles and you will get dupe penalty in weeks.
your site ranks because google considers it as unique.
-=-