UD makes Wiki "properly".
There are two ways to create WIKI posts.
1) Without accounts. You create a user name and password and start posting. The problem is - on most WIKI sites people can come in and repurpose every link you make. (That's te whole purpose of WIKI after all) Find a link, change the target.
2) With accounts. In most (not all - but most) cases, the articles/WIKI posts you create if you first fully create an account (not just user name and password - but also email verification etc) CANNOT be hijacked by other people.
Most SEO tools do none email verified WIKI posting. UD does email verifies WIKI posting.
The idea behind WIKI is that anyone should be able to log in and alter whatever anyone else has posted
The best method with UD is to create say 2000 WIKI accounts - then wait up to 48 hours for them to be activated by the site mods. Then post your content. You can post many times over to the same account, and unless someone else has created a fully authorised account, then in most cases they can't hijhack your links.
Creating a link hijack bot in Ubot is a 2 hour job. Sadly this is a huge weakness of quick WIKI links, the whole idea of the platform is that the content is open for ANYONE to edit - and that includes your link targets. So you do all the hard work, create and post all the content - then someone else in your niche just jumps in and redirects all your links with an automated tool. WIKI is unique in having this weakness, but like I say - that was the entire point of WIKI in the first place.Open source multi user editing info platform. Anyone can jump in and alter/update what others have done. Can't blame WIKI for doing what it was designed to do.
Scritty
