UBot Or Winautomation ?

Zennoposter is amazing. Got the demo, and bought it 30mins later. Its great.
 
If you have to code script for yourself (as in no interest in selling them) I cast my vote to iMacros for your web automation if you still don't have a clue. It's free, you can port your scripts basically wherever firefox runs, it has a macro recorder that's dead simple and... you don't need to rely on ie as a backend. Not exactly a minor feature if you need to create bots that are reliable.
 
I shared with you guys my templates which make fake youtube views.
I can insert urls, you can search it by "shinigami" keyword on the forum
My thread was removed. I don't know why.
I attached YouTube fake views templates here.
 

Attachments

One big difference between WinAutomation compare to Ubot is WinAutomation do not able to create GUI. It only created 1 single exe files. I don't see any option to change the icon of the exe file created in WinAutomation. WinAutomation also do not provide proxy flipping as in Ubot. I guess WinAutomation have more user friendly tweeter tools.

I really like to test out Ubot to give better comparison.
 
i chat with a person on skype who sell zennoposter template. i asked him if he could make me gmail and fake youtube views template. he replied it's not possible for this version of zennoposter.
It's really easy to make fake YouTube views with ZennoPoster.
And we have users who automate gmail accounts creation with ZennoPoster, but they don't share this success on public.

can anyone tell me how/what the differences are between ubot and ZennoPoster ?
please take a look on this thread
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...using-zenno-poster.html?highlight=zennoposter
Anyone know the limits of zennoposter regarding feeds??
please explain what exactly do you mean
 
I am using both

Ubot for web automation
Winautomation for windows

They can work together, it depends on what do you need.
 
I would recommend Zennoposter. I had both and I asked for a re-fund for Ubot. The only positive thing with Ubot over Zennoposter is compiling .exe, which can be very important for some people.

But Zennoposter is in my opinion, much, much more powerful. Which is understandable, since russians are insane programmers...
 
I always thought the Phoenicians were genetically the superior programmers. If we're talking of-all-time, that is. And I mean, don't even get me started on the chinese! It's like it's in their blood!

:biglaugh:




Which is understandable, since russians are insane programmers...
 
I always thought the Phoenicians were genetically the superior programmers. If we're talking of-all-time, that is. And I mean, don't even get me started on the chinese! It's like it's in their blood!

:biglaugh:

I wish there was a way to "Unthank" posts..
 
win is good
ubawt requires u to have programming background (cant write actual name cause it wont let me lol)
however some programming language requires too with win but ubot requires alot more.
 
ubot sucks it's all buggy and shit and the way you create bots with it will take 5-10 days of learning vb.net to know all what ubot does and you can create it twice as better and bug free...

This is correct!

I use as addition AutoIt (FREE) and yes you can do Browser Automation with it!
 
As I do agree that UBot has some bugs it has never being something that has stopped me from creating something I want. I have developed over 150 bots with it and I have yet not come across a bug that have prevented me from moving forward and I do have some really complicated and advanced bots.

Yes AutoIT might be free but is much harder to learn if you ask me.
 
A lot of the browser freezing and UI freezing bugs were fixed with Ubot lately, so now I am able to use it for all sorts of quick tasks. I can only highly recommend it :)
 
Back
Top