None of the "speed calculators" have any real significance, especially when everyone is using something different (and even when they're using the same software but different texts). People don't realize how many factors come into play, _especially_ the content. Take two people with the same typing speed, from two different fields (e.g. one being a geography teacher and the other being a doctor). Guaranteed the doctor would stomp the teacher on a speed test that contains a lot of medical terms, and the reverse is also true (e.g. uncommon places). Give someone words they don't know and watch how drastically their speed drops.
Typing:
Be mindful of how you approach time. Watching the clock is not the same as watching the sun rise.
I got 120 WPM.
But while typing:
Talent is cheaper than table salt. What separates the talented individual from the successful one is a lot of hard work.
I got 105.
Meanwhile, typing the same sentence over and over and over (this is a test), I was able to consistently stay at 190WPM indefinitely. But think about it, in that case, no word is longer than 4 characters so of course my "WPM" is high - the real question would be character per minute.
For what it's worth, I'm using:
calculatorcat.com/typing_test/
