Two questions about Web2.0

thrall

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
177
Reaction score
19
Hello friends, i'm having good results creating 1 article / 1 web2.0.

But i see the better result is create for example 3-5 articles per web2.0 right?

Can i create 1 article per day for each web2.0? Or i need wait more time to create my second article, like 1 week?

My other question: I have one web2.0 that have 3 articles... but only the homepage indexed, my question is: I need create backlinks to posts too for index? or just wait? can i use any indexer to try index fast that posts not indexed ?

Thanks!
 
You don't need to take time between two posts, you can post it regularly without any limitations. But you just stay focused on posting unique contents. If you didn't do anything it will automatically get indexed. But it takes some time and we can't figure out how much time it takes to index a post. If you want to make your posts indexed soon, you can ping the post url to Google or try some link indexing tools online.
 
Can i create like 2 posts in same day for 1 web2.0?

I have instant link indexer, my backlinks automatically indexed my homepage but the post urls no :( i'll wait because 50% of my links waiting for index...

Thanks for reply!

You don't need to take time between two posts, you can post it regularly without any limitations. But you just stay focused on posting unique contents. If you didn't do anything it will automatically get indexed. But it takes some time and we can't figure out how much time it takes to index a post. If you want to make your posts indexed soon, you can ping the post url to Google or try some link indexing tools online.
 
Last edited:
You should make some Tier 2 links pointing to Tier 1 web2.0 site. And then Tier 3 sites linking to Tier 2. It isn't only about indexing, but about linkjuice and authority. Indexed Tier1 links from web2.0 sites won't help you to improve your moneysite rank, if there isn't any linkjuice.
 
If you are posting multiple articles to your web 2.0 then it is a good thing to provide authority to those web 2.0 sites. Regular update to web 2.0 provides trust. But you do not have to feed them daily with articles ... if there is an option of schedule posting then you can do that as well. 2-3 articles per month is enough if you can maintain it for long time instead of posting 2 articles a day for a month and then stop.

Bad thing with web 2.0 is all your hard work may be useless because your web 2.0 may get banned. So you do not have much control over it like custom domains.
 
Whether you are using it for traffic or backlink you don't need a break unless you feel so.

There is no rules that says you should give an interval before another post, just ensure you content are unique and of high quality.
 
Thank you all for answering... but my question not is responded...

I created 3 articles per web2.0... but that articles not indexed, for example: only the first article indexed on wordpress web2.0 and my anchor link is on third article... i need wait more a few days to see the third article indexed? or i can index with instant link indexer? thanks!!
 
Only regular updated Web 2.0 with tones of drip feed backlinks can become authority sites.

Regular updated means at least 1 post every month
 
Can i create like 2 posts in same day for 1 web2.0?

I have instant link indexer, my backlinks automatically indexed my homepage but the post urls no :( i'll wait because 50% of my links waiting for index...

Thanks for reply!

A fresh web 2.0 will always take a little while to index, it's just the way it does.

Adding the links to instant index will get, as will sending a few tier 2 / 3 links its way too. I find a small GSA run is more enough to get a web 2.0 indexed fine.

Only regular updated Web 2.0 with tones of drip feed backlinks can become authority sites.

Regular updated means at least 1 post every month


Ye totally, is'nt there a guy who preaches the idea of ranking your web 2.0's in the top 50 for your money term. In effect your web 2.0 links are like "mini money sites" - well not exactly but you get the general idea.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top