Tube increaser 2.1

M

madinaz

BANNED

Jan 12, 2008

614

1,288

• Mar 19, 2009

• #1

I've been using it this week without a problem 5000-10000 views a day. Yet I hear all these people saying that this software isn't working. What exactly isn't it doing?

 

M

Misfire

Junior Member

Feb 22, 2009

102

16

• Mar 19, 2009

• #2

madinaz said:

I've been using it this week without a problem 5000-10000 views a day. Yet I hear all these people saying that this software isn't working. What exactly isn't it doing?

Click to expand...

What really?

Have you been reading the threads at all?

What it isn't doing is being registered as views.

Its only inflating the view count to 200 but youtube isn't registering the views as legit, so therefore it doesn't work.

 

M

madinaz

BANNED

Jan 12, 2008

614

1,288

• Mar 19, 2009
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

Maybe I'm just getting real views then because it's working for me. I put up crappy vids so I have no idea then

 

M

madinaz

BANNED

Jan 12, 2008

614

1,288

• Mar 19, 2009
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #4

Nevermind I just checked out my vids and I'm getting a ton of hits from fark.com so I guess I was just wasting my time with Tube increaser

 

M

Misfire

Junior Member

Feb 22, 2009

102

16

• Mar 20, 2009

• #5

lvllcbl said:

There working on a fix for Tube increaser right now, they said it would be out within 2 weeks.

Click to expand...

source please?

 

B

bombsight

Newbie

Mar 11, 2009

46

10

• Mar 20, 2009

• #6

Misfire said:

source please?

Click to expand...

his imagination.

 

S

sonofanun

Newbie

Mar 27, 2009

7

0

• Mar 28, 2009

• #7

bombsight said:

his imagination.

Click to expand...

amen.

sadly i think the only work around is going to be real human views. anyone care to share any optimism (that is legit)?

that dude in another thread talking 'bout trafficholder.com swears by it. i only like a quick jumpstart of 500-800 and then mine normally take off on their own due to offsite embeds and my mailing list....Just more than f'ing 202-214 please!

anyone else use trafficholder.com?