Try this!

onetoo3com

Registered Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
92
Reaction score
50
This is weird, but interesting!

If you can raed this, you have a sgtrane mnid too

Can you raed this? It's said, Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

I cdnuolt blveiee that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in what oerdr the ltteres in a word are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is that the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the word as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

I don't really know about the 55/100 claim, lets find out...
About 4 or 5 words I hesitated on.
 
I've seen that article posted many times before, but even the very first time I read it about as fast as if it had not been misspelled.

I'm surprised the number of people that can read that isn't even higher. Maybe I've just been online so many years that I can read typos like that without a hesitation.
 
i read it in the same way as it would be on the correct format.
 
Yup, no problem reading it here either. Actually just as easy to read as if all the letters wree wehre thye are sppoused to be.
 
I can read it perfectly too..I think it is from all of the practice that i get from proof reading bad spellers.
 
amazing, I read it as it was in the correct format.
 
I've read it perfectly, but it felt like I was listening to Psych Trance. I love the feeling :D
 
I can read the entire paragraph but what for mind do i have? "Sgtrane" mind?
Posted via Mobile Device
 
If any word is rewritten keeping the outer characters intact while inner character are positioned anywhere within that word, then that word will still make sense.

It gives me an idea -- about duplicate content! Can a dup be rewritten accordingly? ;) Why, readers would still be able to read it and Big G shouldn't have any problems then. lol (i.e., if it is still able to generate traffic to it or it can rank that special article :()

j/k
 
i read everything perfectly except for "total mess" took me a few seconds to register.
 
This is weird, but interesting!

If you can raed this, you have a sgtrane mnid too

Can you raed this? It's said, Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

I cdnuolt blveiee that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in what oerdr the ltteres in a word are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is that the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the word as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

I don't really know about the 55/100 claim, lets find out...
About 4 or 5 words I hesitated on.

I raed the wlhoe tinhg wtohuit a peblrom, taths atcaluly pterty cool
 
Last edited:
If any word is rewritten keeping the outer characters intact while inner character are positioned anywhere within that word, then that word will still make sense.

It gives me an idea -- about duplicate content! Can a dup be rewritten accordingly? ;) Why, readers would still be able to read it and Big G shouldn't have any problems then. lol (i.e., if it is still able to generate traffic to it or it can rank that special article :()

j/k

hmm i think if you tried to index an entire article like this, google would just consider it to be complete jibberish. their bots really wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the OP's post and

oop cv dlkjg fd gdgio dogfd fl zkj sjdhfksj kwjh wkejrh aks ufksh fuskj jdfh

since no correctly spelled words exist anywhere. the fact that humans could still read it wouldn't really matter to google and their algorithms in this case.
 
Back
Top