"Transformative Content" for Podcast Clips Shorts

henneyson

Newbie
Joined
Aug 30, 2024
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Started my first channel this week, Hit 1.5M views / 2k subs (Shorts), so creeping up to monetisation eligibility pretty quickly.

I post Podcast stories, heavily edited (audio is basically just V.O track with visuals being my own animated gfx/stock/etc) & stories are pulled from multiple sources (Original podcast, sourced interviews, documentaries etc). The quality of content is high.

Is there any hope of monetisation on these? Or are podcast clips basically blacklisted?

Wondering if I should pivot into more monetisable content/switch to long-form with the platform I've built already before it's too late if there's no chance to monetize.



Any help appreciated, super new to this!
Thanks
 
You need to edit them and add (in YouTube's own words) "insightful commentary". If your plan is to just copy and paste other videos, post compilations, or spamming a bunch of trash low quality content you won't get monetized. Or if you do, it will be removed eventually. They do regular sweeps. Just had one a few weeks ago where I had to send an appeal. Even if you're doing everything correctly you can still get flagged. Podcasts seem to be working now, but they might not in the future. At one point they allowed reddit comment videos and meditation, now they don't. Once people oversaturate it with low effort content it could be a problem.
 
You need to edit them and add (in YouTube's own words) "insightful commentary". If your plan is to just copy and paste other videos, post compilations, or spamming a bunch of trash low quality content you won't get monetized. Or if you do, it will be removed eventually. They do regular sweeps. Just had one a few weeks ago where I had to send an appeal. Even if you're doing everything correctly you can still get flagged. Podcasts seem to be working now, but they might not in the future. At one point they allowed reddit comment videos and meditation, now they don't. Once people oversaturate it with low effort content it could be a problem.
I edit them heavily, my question is if drawing multiple sources of a story/event into a cohesive short constitutes "transformative content". Completely agree with low quality videos but these are high quality. The Podcast clip itself just acts as voiceover.

Interesting about "insightful commentary" - is this as obvious as my own voice on a video, or could i draw insightful commentary from multiple external sources? Would that elevate the content from the original podcast clip in the eyes of Youtube?

For example:

- I'm making a short about the invention of toilet paper, I have a guy on Joe Rogan talking about the invention of toilet paper (Voice only). Voice lines from other sources are added (a toilet paper documentary from the 80s, an unrelated podcast talking about the invention of toilet paper. Then all my original visuals (GFX/Stock/Occasionaly back to podcasts) Would me bringing this story together make me eligible?


Hopefully rambling makes sense

Thanks
 
I edit them heavily, my question is if drawing multiple sources of a story/event into a cohesive short constitutes "transformative content". Completely agree with low quality videos but these are high quality. The Podcast clip itself just acts as voiceover.

Interesting about "insightful commentary" - is this as obvious as my own voice on a video, or could i draw insightful commentary from multiple external sources? Would that elevate the content from the original podcast clip in the eyes of Youtube?

For example:

- I'm making a short about the invention of toilet paper, I have a guy on Joe Rogan talking about the invention of toilet paper (Voice only). Voice lines from other sources are added (a toilet paper documentary from the 80s, an unrelated podcast talking about the invention of toilet paper. Then all my original visuals (GFX/Stock/Occasionaly back to podcasts) Would me bringing this story together make me eligible?


Hopefully rambling makes sense

Thanks

The problem with the term they use "insightful commentary" and transformative is that it's subjective. It could be as little as a voice over put over a clip, or they could expect you to chop multiple clips, add commentary, sound effects, texts, emojis etc.. personally I try to do all of it. The more unique the better, however don't add stuff just for the sake of adding stuff. Shorts need to be quick and highly engaging within the first 5 seconds or they have no chance of going viral. This is hard to do with a podcast clip unless you're leeching off big names or it's something actually interesting. So you probably have to add stuff to keep the viewers attention anyway because everyone has short attention bird brains now. You're probably fine. My channel still gets flagged and demonetized every couple months, I just send an appeal video showing how I edit videos and it's back up within 24-48 hours. As long as you do everything correct you'll be fine. Just avoid the low effort/easy content. It's better to spend your time making one really good video a day/week then pumping out 10+ bullshit videos everyday.
 
The problem with the term they use "insightful commentary" and transformative is that it's subjective. It could be as little as a voice over put over a clip, or they could expect you to chop multiple clips, add commentary, sound effects, texts, emojis etc.. personally I try to do all of it. The more unique the better, however don't add stuff just for the sake of adding stuff. Shorts need to be quick and highly engaging within the first 5 seconds or they have no chance of going viral. This is hard to do with a podcast clip unless you're leeching off big names or it's something actually interesting. So you probably have to add stuff to keep the viewers attention anyway because everyone has short attention bird brains now. You're probably fine. My channel still gets flagged and demonetized every couple months, I just send an appeal video showing how I edit videos and it's back up within 24-48 hours. As long as you do everything correct you'll be fine. Just avoid the low effort/easy content. It's better to spend your time making one really good video a day/week then pumping out 10+ bullshit videos everyday.
Appreciate the reply man. Yeah totally get you on subjectivity. I do all the things you mentioned (besides original commentary) so will see how it goes. My professional background is in film editing so I'm not worried about appeal/quality, It's just eligibility for monetisation, I don't want to invest more hours if there isn't a light at the end of the tunnel.

So you use your own voiceover on your hooks? Does that not hurt engagement?


Thanks
 
Given that your videos have achieved 1.5 million views and 2000 subscribers in just one week, it's clear that they're highly popular. So, why would you worry about YouTube demonetizing or terminating your channel? With such high engagement, you're bound to be making a decent income. YouTube would be eager to have creators like you on their platform. If your content violated YouTube's guidelines, it would likely be flagged and removed within a day, not a week
 
Given that your videos have achieved 1.5 million views and 2000 subscribers in just one week, it's clear that they're highly popular. So, why would you worry about YouTube demonetizing or terminating your channel? With such high engagement, you're bound to be making a decent income. YouTube would be eager to have creators like you on their platform. If your content violated YouTube's guidelines, it would likely be flagged and removed within a day, not a week
There are hundreds of more popular podcast channels that aren't monetised. I haven't applied for monetisation yet, so don't want to fall at the first hurdle if there's something I can do now to have my videos be monetisable!
 
You can record yourself or find transparent video of person who is explaining something. Put that person in some corner of your short. Then you can add an audio layer that will represent what is person talking about. Could be completely fake and non relatable to any subject or language. It helps not getting demonetized, so keep that in mind.

And you can also do that on repeat for every video, same person, same audio.
 
You can record yourself or find transparent video of person who is explaining something. Put that person in some corner of your short. Then you can add an audio layer that will represent what is person talking about. Could be completely fake and non relatable to any subject or language. It helps not getting demonetized, so keep that in mind.

And you can also do that on repeat, same person, same audio.
Do you have any examples of what you mean?
 
Do you have any examples of what you mean?

Yes, but I will re-explain myself.

You know green screen thing? Where you record yourself and then put yourself in some background of a video.

Just do that. It's not cool to share other people content, not even in DM, so I won't do it.


All gamers and content creators actually do it, put their face in some bottom video corner so they are visible to their audience.

Mimic that.
 
Yes, but I will re-explain myself.

You know green screen thing? Where you record yourself and then put yourself in some background of a video.

Just do that. It's not cool to share other people content, not even in DM, so I won't do it.


All gamers and content creators actually do it, put their face in some bottom video corner so they are visible to their audience.

Mimic that.
Thanks for the reply mate. I see these on movie shorts, where someone is directly trying to avoid copyright. I'm not concerned about copyright for my shorts, more the manual approval for monetisation from Youtube.

It seems a good method, although my concern would be damaging retention for my niche if the hook of my shorts suddenly has a random dude in the corner.
 
Thanks for the reply mate. I see these on movie shorts, where someone is directly trying to avoid copyright. I'm not concerned about copyright for my shorts, more the manual approval for monetisation from Youtube.

It seems a good method, although my concern would be damaging retention for my niche if the hook of my shorts suddenly has a random dude in the corner.

Who told you it must be a random dude? This is where your mind steps in :)

You can put a wheel that rolls and talks abut jackpot on 10% volume, and see if it damages anything.

I'm just shooting my first thought. Anyway, I wanted to give you this as an useful info that comes in after getting monetized.

You should be able to get monetized easy IMO without any edits now. Good luck bud.
 
Who told you it must be a random dude? This is where your mind steps in :)

You can put a wheel that rolls and talks abut jackpot on 10% volume, and see if it damages anything.

I'm just shooting my first thought. Anyway, I wanted to give you this as an useful info that comes in after getting monetized.

You should be able to get monetized easy IMO without any edits now. Good luck bud.
Sorry I misunderstood your explanation!

That's an interesting concept, I'll give it a try thanks :)
 
A
Started my first channel this week, Hit 1.5M views / 2k subs (Shorts), so creeping up to monetisation eligibility pretty quickly.

I post Podcast stories, heavily edited (audio is basically just V.O track with visuals being my own animated gfx/stock/etc) & stories are pulled from multiple sources (Original podcast, sourced interviews, documentaries etc). The quality of content is high.

Is there any hope of monetisation on these? Or are podcast clips basically blacklisted?

Wondering if I should pivot into more monetisable content/switch to long-form with the platform I've built already before it's too late if there's no chance to monetize.



Any help appreciated, super new to this!
Thanks
Add your narration(critique the video through out and also play the original podcast clip with og audio, you can get monetized that way, basically how most cashcow channels work.
 
A

Add your narration(critique the video through out and also play the original podcast clip with og audio, you can get monetized that way, basically how most cashcow channels work.
So using multiple different clips as V.O (Different youtube videos/perspectives of a story) wouldn't be enough?
 
All you need to do is appear on the videos yourself, add your face as an over-lay and talk for a little bit to add some context.

This way you shouldn't attract any issues from YouTube, if you do you can make a video showing how you make the videos and explain you're showing your own face.
 
All you need to do is appear on the videos yourself, add your face as an over-lay and talk for a little bit to add some context.

This way you shouldn't attract any issues from YouTube, if you do you can make a video showing how you make the videos and explain you're showing your own face.
I feel like this would totally kill my engagement as a hook.
 
Back
Top