Those using AI content: Do you understand the risks associated with this?

paisawaisa

Elite Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
3,972
Reaction score
1,083
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
NO. AI and auto blogging is the real passive income.
spending hours and hours writing a piece of content, then spending $$$ for promoting it, and in the end some kid will outrank you with stupid PBN backlinks.
If I were google, I would spend more resource discovering the PBNs, actually changing the type of ranking not to be so much dependent on the back-links.

You think paying for backlinks is better then generating AI content?
 
What Google says and what they do are poles apart (atleast from my past experience)

But creating content with AI gives you the liberty to write articles (generate content in general) and also most importantly saves time and money possibly.

If you look at AI as churn and burn, you won't drown in the sea of updates!

Also, the money people make in short term is insane. You can always reinvest it
 
Those who are building these kind of sites earning a passive income in a short time
 
It's hard to say how exactly Google will identify AI content.

Most AI content just reads like human-written content, just a tad bit incoherent or rambling, no different than many outsourcers tbh. Probably because GPT3 itself has been trained on a ton of internet data (in addition to libgen books). If you look at some of the 'human-generated' content out there, some of it looks like markov text - - not everyone on the internet is Shakespeare or Hemingway.

Google will probably go after the most obvious AI content, like websites that don't have much authority but are spitting out 10k pages a day, or websites that have no pages other than PAA.
But perhaps not even that...who really knows, so far Google has been spectacularly bad at preventing spam, so it's not like they have them most amazing track record.

This isn't to say that google is terrible at everything - - they choose to focus on a few things and are really good at those things (extracting snippets from websites, for example), but to say Google is amazingly good at detecting spam is...optimistic, at the very least.
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
It's really hard to say until how google update works or target for AI contents. But remember Google Updates are always shocking all the time.
 
The question is how are they really going to detect it? The 1 click generate unless content will most defiantly be targeted.

But if used correctly with a mix of ai and human intervention I think it's going to be nearly impossible to detect.
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
What time?
It takes 1 hour to set up a workspace to generate 500 articles.

But yes, I fully agree. Nobody should start any A.I. site. please don't do this. Google will have it's revenge. Total waste of time.

Again, please don't do it.
It's crowded as it is already.
 
That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
Lol
tell that to the Black hat community of the OG era.
Despite what other people tell you, some shortcuts are worth taking.
Some shortcuts will make you rich, some shortcuts can lead to stable success.

keep fudding, this is what google wants anyways.
#ngmi
 
I think most people who simply blast PAA know that this isn't a stable project, but if you use it with a twist, make it factual and unique, wheres the problem? its efficient
 
The problem with AI writing is that it denies the web chance to get original ideas from real human content creators. For instance, only a real human creator can actually buy products, use them and review them. With AI, the technology simply relies on what's available out there and simply regurgitates it. Therefore, if AI is encouraged the levels of originality and depth of content will ultimately start going down.

Content writing is an art just like music. Users appreciate it when there's a human touch to art. Would you go to Youtube to search for AI generated music for instance? Of course no. And therein lies the challenge for AI content creation.
 
I think most people who simply blast PAA know that this isn't a stable project, but if you use it with a twist, make it factual and unique, wheres the problem? its efficient
PAA is not A.I., it's copy/paste.

Making it unique and factual is where A.I. comes into play.

Look at this article:
https://www.techwalla.com/articles/difference-in-8gb-ram-vs-4gb-ram-with-windows-64-bit
It's a legit website, most of their articles are published way before A.I. was even a thing.

It looks like GPT-1 wrote it.
But it's not A.I. It's just thin content. That website gets over 2 mil UV/month.
That's what google wants to aim.

Some A.I. will be hit, sure. But most who use A.I. aim for volume.
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
No, google can't know if somethings written by AI or not without manual review and even then depending on the quality you can't really tell. Google isn't as smart as u think it is
 
NO. AI and auto blogging is the real passive income.
spending hours and hours writing a piece of content, then spending $$$ for promoting it, and in the end some kid will outrank you with stupid PBN backlinks.
If I were google, I would spend more resource discovering the PBNs, actually changing the type of ranking not to be so much dependent on the back-links.

You think paying for backlinks is better then generating AI content?
Even for ranking AI content, you need backlinks.
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
Google updates have always targeted spam and that's why autoblogs, splogs are still here in 2022. :p
Only time will tell but I think it will only become tougher to use AI content this model of churn and burn sites will not die with this update.
 
Now AI content blogs will be targetted by next Google update which they already announced. In less than 1 year, all these blogs will become useless. The time and energy and money invest e in these will be wasted. That is why one should always thing long term before using shortcuts like AI content. Do you agree?
I think if I use AI on my blog I'll probably DIE
 
Back
Top