Why not? People are benefiting from it so there’s no harm in bumping it!
This Script Made Me $XX,XXX
- Thread starter consus
- Start date
- Status
random_user1
Newbie
- Mar 10, 2019
- 6
- 1
But does this even rank in google? (maybe making the tool ignore the keywords?) because if you search a spinned keyword in google no results are found, so maybe it doesnt even detect it as text?? im confused
Krawly0
BANNED
- Mar 24, 2019
- 11
- 1
It's handy for getting decent content onto your new site which will help make it look legit and draw more traffic, however, I think Google will have wised up by now and it won't boost your ranking.
random_user1
Newbie
- Mar 10, 2019
- 6
- 1
alright... so a website with only this as content wouldnt rank? i have a few domains that im not using and i was thinking about testing it on one of them, maybe on a low competition niche
Dark Venge
Regular Member
- Dec 27, 2018
- 256
- 159
It'll come handy to submit guest posts.
Krawly0
BANNED
- Mar 24, 2019
- 11
- 1
You've got nothing to lose.
random_user1
Newbie
- Mar 10, 2019
- 6
- 1
Yea ill test it... maybe ignoring the keywords in the spinner and with good link building it ranks
- Sep 10, 2010
- 11,807
- 26,658
Well, you just bumped it.
Seriously, even if it was working; I wouldn't use it anywhere; not even tier 2/tier 3. If ever there was an exact opposite of "search engine friendly" article, this would be it. Stay away.
Too late for that lol.
Do you know how it works? It simply replaces letters, symbols etc with the ASCII code. The idea is that likely the shitty plagiarism checks d not render those codes, and thus it looks unique to them...
Now ask yourself:
Google has Vision AI to read content on pictures, rendering ASCII code likely does not take any significant CPU, etc. thus, do you think they will be fooled by this crappy spun content?
I'll close this as it's reported as not working.
I was using something like this 6 years back, it was great to fool Copyscape etc and even Google but a lot of things change in 6 years. To the naked eye the artilce was word for wrod exactly the same, it was the unicode changed.
I was using something like this 6 years back, it was great to fool Copyscape etc and even Google but a lot of things change in 6 years. To the naked eye the artilce was word for wrod exactly the same, it was the unicode changed.
- Status