This Pervert MUST Be Found!

Kickflip said:

I compare them because they are the same type of thing. Again, just because some chases a girl with a snake doesn't mean he is sick in the head. He is fully in control of the situation and himself. He isn't necessarily doing it for his own sick satisfaction, but for the entertainment of others watching. He knows that the girl wont be harmed long term, and will get over it very quickly.

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

Just a couple of films where older Women kiss and/or simulate sex and have multiple nude scenes with Children:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0337876/parentalguide

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067810/parentalguide

It is normal in the entertainment industry. If the guy was just walking up kissing girls in the street, that would be different.

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

You can't defend yourself? You can't take that to court where I'm 99.99% sure that playing around blowing on a kids belly would be thrown out in court, that is if someone would ever even think that was child molestation, which who would? Comparing that to Michael Jackson sleeping in bed with children who were not his is completely different. Your comparisons are absolutely horrendous.

You go from doing comparisons about what if someone was blowing on a child's belly and the parents said it was child molestation to defending a guy who is kissing random little girls on the lips. I just don't understand....

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

Whether it gets thrown out in court or not isn't the issue. The damage will already be done and your life will be ruined. You think I am stretching the truth? Truth is stranger then fiction. Watch the video on this page and tell me they did the right thing! What kind of SICK PERVERTED parents take fun photos of their smiling kids in bath robes slightly exposing their bodies? Only a PERVERT would think a picture of a nude child is cute. Right?

http://videosift.com/video/Parents-charged-with-sexual-abuse-for-bathing-kids?loadcomm=1

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

Does kissing little girls entertain you? If not, this is in no way a comparison. If it does, then you need to get checked out.

"Now let me ask you one question (YES/NO): If you were approached to be the host on this talk show and the producers told you to be in the little girls faces, asking inappropriate questions and to kiss and attempt to kiss little girls, would you?

NOTE: Even though there are no facts that say the producers actually asked him to do this and I highly doubt they would."

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

ACTING and CONSENT!!!!!!!!! What don't you get? The actors have consent from the parents and there are multiple legal documents signed to enable the child to be present during these scenes. The child is also an ACTOR being paid.

I don't understand how you don't get that being paid, ACTING and having CONSENT doing and experiencing these things is in no way to be compared to a random guy on a talk show kissing random girls.

I answer the questions you direct towards me, yet you keep ignoring mine. You can't defend this guy and then say you wouldn't allow your child to get kissed by him, but I want to actually see that you type that you would allow this to happen to your child.

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

So physical and mental torture is acceptable to you, but sexual behavior is unacceptable?

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

Just like rakoom, I'm done. You don't get the point. You constantly come up with irrelevant comparisons and contradict your opinion time and time again. It makes me sick that you don't see how this guy is a pervert and how you would defend him. I have no interest in wasting my time trying to give valid points of how this is not right.

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

Kissing little girls doesn't entertain me, no. That isn't what the entertainment value of the show was. You are just being a troll saying shit like that. The entertainment value came from the girls rejecting the guy.

No, I would not be the host of the show, because I don't feel comfortable kissing people I don't know on the mouth. But I don't feel HE is a pervert simply because he did it. For all we know, we could have felt VERY uncomfortable doing it.

You guys are just assuming WAY too much about this guy. To accuse him of being a pervert, when you have NO idea what happens off camera is bloody stupid. You guys obviously don't realize that what you see on television is NOT the entire story.

We don't know what contracts or consent were given.

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

Sure, thats what people always say when they know their arguments are starting to fall apart.

The bottom line is this: You guys have NO idea what happened behind the scenes.

You are making assumptions that millions of viewers over a 4 year span and 400+ episodes, hundreds of crew members, thousands of contestants, and the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council all failed to realize that this guy was being a pervert, and didn't try to get permission from the parents or children to kiss the contestants.

You feel that it took around 25+ years for the truth to finally be revealed by a lonely YouTuber who gathered the "evidence" and finally brought the truth to light.

Doesn't that sound a bit ridiculous to you guys? You guys obviously know more about his mental state then the people who worked side by side with him daily, from a few minutes of edited footage.

Click to expand...

Kickflip said:

Sure, thats what people always say when they know their arguments are starting to fall apart.

Click to expand...

virtual.indiano said:

Remember Wikileaks? It was started by only One Man

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

who likes to kiss random little girls.

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

I said I was done, because you're backing up a pervert who likes to kiss random little girls. You don't listen to the constant valid points I make and you constantly contradicted yourself. Why in the world would I continue to argue when that's all you do? Maybe you need to scroll up and start over with the conversation, my argument was no where close to falling apart, yours on the other hand started off as arguing and turned into absurd comparisons and points being made.

Click to expand...

Brainstorming said:

I said I was done

Click to expand...

no4h~ said:

You are being ridiculous, period. I was going to keep quiet in this thread because my views contrast the majority of the repliers and I know debating this topic isn't going to somehow change any of our opinions on the topic.

These 'random little girls' you keep referring to were contestants on a fucking television show. There wasn't anything sexual even implied, and if the parents suspected anything suspicious, they probably would have avoided bringing their children to the airings of the show, or would have avoided them from becoming a contestant.

You people dwell and become so incredibly angry (pitchforks, and all...) when you see stories like this, or when you read the newspaper to see that somebody was charged with looking at CP (but hadn't actually done anything to anybody) instead of actually concerning yourselves with somebody who is actually causing somebody harm, physical or mental damage. Attack the individuals that's harming children, not comically kissing them during a fucking television show.

Click to expand...

no4h~ said:

You are being ridiculous, period. I was going to keep quiet in this thread because my views contrast poorly with the majority of the repliers and I know debating this topic isn't going to somehow change any of our opinions on the topic... but I couldn't sit back and just let you go on and on about these 'random little girls' you keep bringing up... as if for some reason these girls weren't part of a fucking television show 20 some-odd years ago.

Give it a break dude, really. These 'random little girls' you keep referring to were contestants on a fucking television show. There wasn't anything sexual even implied, and if the parents suspected anything suspicious, they probably would have avoided bringing their children to the airings of the show, or would have avoided them from becoming a contestant.

It's insane how the majority of you twats are attacking a fucking host of a show 20-25 years ago. It's disgusting how many of you are making such horrible claims about this man whom you know nothing about. You people dwell and become so incredibly angry (pitchforks, and all...) when you see stories like this, or when you read the newspaper to see that somebody was charged with looking at CP (but hadn't actually done anything to anybody) instead of actually concerning yourselves with somebody who is actually causing somebody harm, physical or mental damage. Attack the individuals that's harming children, not comically kissing them during a fucking television show.



Learn how to fucking debate.

You said you were done 3 times, and yet you continue to reply with shit like 'omg i said i waz done. here's another iteration of my point~~`!1'.

You can't make a point, and then not expect a fucking rebuttal.

Click to expand...