This is what I have learned on BHW.

Cool thanks mate.

I have had 7, 400 word articles (one article for each page of my site) created recently and they are getting submitted to directorys as we speak.
So i'll be buying 7 blasts to send to 7 of the ezine article pages. Always been worried about sending blasts direct to my site. Having said that, my site is 7 years old, has over 1000 backlinks and PR3.

bobbylove321 said:

Of course.

Since ezinearticles already has super authority, then you just need to have your article's title with the targeted keyword in it.

You should also mention your keywords about 4-7 times through out your ezine article, then blast away.

It depends on how competitive your keywords are, so for example, if you are targeting "car", then your not going to rank on the first page.

Click to expand...

Bobby,
is it more difficult to get a co.uk or info site ranked , would you say than a .com ?

in order to get ranked for the keyword you want to rank you, you almost have to earn it by ranking for many similar keywords and then one day the keyword you want will get ranked too. I make most of my online SEM money with long tail keywords.

Is it better to make 500$ of one keyword or 1$ for each 500 keywords.

Longtail keywords add up fast before you know it.

MisterF said:

Bobby,
is it more difficult to get a co.uk or info site ranked , would you say than a .com ?

Click to expand...

No it's not more difficult.

co.uk will rank you in the uk and not in the u.s. since it's regional domain extension. Sometimes there's exceptions and a co.uk can rank in the u.s. if the targeted keyword is a product sold only in the region of the uk.

.info is typically used for spam, and that's what the majority of spammers use since it's a cheaper domain extension, but if you have good onpage seo and you aren't stuffing your tags or keywords, don't have doorway pages, etc. then you can still maintain good rankings with enough backlinks.

Maybe take a look at the google wonder wheel and get some more LSI keywords. Include these in articles on your blog. Do onpage SEO.

Example Article 1: Write an article including 'wedding planning books' at 5-10% keyword density, include 'wedding planning books' in H1 tag, bold the keyword 'wedding planning books' in article, include LSI keywords in the article like 'wedding planning guide', 'wedding planner books', 'wedding planning checklist' and underline these in your article, put main keyword and the three LSI keywords in your tags. Include main keyword in page header, meta description and include main keyword and LSI keywords in meta keywords.

Example Article 2: Write an article including 'wedding planning book' at 5-10% keyword density, include 'wedding planning book' in H1 tag, bold the keyword 'wedding planning book' in article, include LSI keywords in the article like 'wedding planning guide book', 'wedding planning list', 'online wedding planning book' and underline these in your article, put main keyword and the three LSI keywords in your tags. Include main keyword in page header, meta description and include main keyword and LSI keywords in meta keywords.

And so on....defo use google wonder wheel to get more keywords.

GOOD LUCK!!

2surfcr said:

Can you quickly clarify if aging means domain age as in years old or in the age the site is present on the serps? I have seen terms used like domain incubation, domain ripening, etc all meaning different things to different people.

Thanks and I hope this does not count as jacking the OP

Click to expand...

I have blasted domains around a year old with fantastic results ,I'm not keen to do it on any domain under 6 months old but thats not saying it doesn't work.

Google webmaster tools/labs/site performance:

Performance overview
On average, pages in your site take 7.1 seconds to load (updated on Feb 14, 2011). This is slower than 87% of sites.

Click to expand...

What? I checked my server with various online speed tests and they all have shown good results. I never experienced even 4 seconds load when I tried to enter my website. Google recommended to download "page speed" and I did, results were good - 90/100. What could be wrong? I have read that load time matters in SEO.