rafark
Elite Member
- Jan 15, 2013
- 3,249
- 1,976
So this week I came across a Guardian article and was surprised to find out they were asking for donations 'a la Wikipedia.
It'd be ok if not for the fact they already have four big ads! So you either show ads or ask for money but not both. As a for-profit major publication it makes them look very greedy and cheap.
Take the non-profits like Wikipedia or Wayback Machine: they show no ads, their donation period is once a year and their services are far more useful than those of The Guardian.
Donations to a big, consolidated, for-profit, full of ads and partnerships media website damages their reputation in my opinion.
What'ya think?
It'd be ok if not for the fact they already have four big ads! So you either show ads or ask for money but not both. As a for-profit major publication it makes them look very greedy and cheap.
Take the non-profits like Wikipedia or Wayback Machine: they show no ads, their donation period is once a year and their services are far more useful than those of The Guardian.
Donations to a big, consolidated, for-profit, full of ads and partnerships media website damages their reputation in my opinion.
What'ya think?
Last edited: