The Black Hat Infinity SEO Case Study (Method Steps Inside)

This should be very interesting. I'm going to watch this thread until the end of project and I'm hoping Kimi will answer most of the questions posted here, because I'm still confused about some things.

Go Kimi, go!

Update

As mentioned in OP we had this campaign for all websites:

avg. of 50 unique articles x 500 words (totaling 25k unique content of words)
avg. of 150 unique titles x 6-8 words (totaling 1k unique content of words)
300 web 2.0 blogs (60-70 unique top high quality web 2.0 blogs like wordpress, xanga, webs etc.)

Click to expand...

Backlinks have been sent to indexation 6-8 hours after have been created. This is because I give it some time in case some blogs gets deleted.

Before rankings is in red
After rankings is in green

Attached are screenshots with rankings from today. To see rankings which were before you can check first post.

Website no. 1 - campaign for website no. 1 has not been started, this one was a friend's website with bad SEO which got hit in Penguin 2.0. I will be showing later how to unpenalise a Penguin 2.0 hit site with BlackHatInfinity. Planning to start on 28/May/2013 on this one.

--------------------------------------------------------

Website no. 2 started on 22 May/2013

After 60% backlinks have been indexed:

First keyword - has not been targeted
Second keyword - from #315 to #232
Third keyword - has not been targeted
4th keyword - from no where to #88
5th keyword - from no where to #137



--------------------------------------------------------

Website no. 3 campaign has not been started.

--------------------------------------------------------

Website no. 4 started on 21 May/2013

After 80-90% backlinks have been indexed:

First keyword - from no where to #28
Second keyword - from no where to #179
Third keyword - from no where to #54
4th keyword - has not been targeted
5th keyword - has not been targeted



--------------------------------------------------------

Website no. 5 campaign has been started from short time, backlinks have not been sent to indexation yet - obviously no rankings yet.
--------------------------------------------------------

Website no. 6 campaign has not been started.

--------------------------------------------------------

2/2 campaigns which have been started reported positive movements. And that's only from 1 campaign, imagine what you can do with 3x or 5x campaigns. You can pretty much hit #1 on all of the niches. This is how blackhat works - no link velocity, no anchor diversification (maximum 3 keywords have been used on each campaign). First campaign is still in dance, second is slightly stable.

You just need unique content to get indexed in Google and a software to create web 2.0 blogs (contextual backlinks from authoritative sites.) Simple as that.

Let me know if some of you have questions.

What are you using to create your Web 2.0 properties?

If you have 50 articles and make 300 web20s do you just reuse each 6 times? And use unique titles for each?

Do you build any other backlinks or only web20s? Did the sites have any other backlinks before you started?

Have you tried this with branded anchor text links only and only having the keywords in the article. If you have what was the difference in rankings?

And thank you for sharing

Awesome share. Glad to see there are still some members who share the real deal around this forum. Too many misunderstanding info around here lately if you know what I mean...

You just forgot to mention there are others sources to get contextual backlinks. I do agree high pr web 2.0 are important but others sources such as wiki, buddypress, jcow, etc...those are excellent places to post articles with contextual backlinks too. And by the way, you dont need to prove anything to anyone (i guess) this works today as worked 5 years ago, same way, same method, just this days its wayyyy more easy.

psytrance, open source platforms like jcow or buddypress or wikis are not powerful. That's why I said web 2.0 blogs.

Kimi said:

psytrance, open source platforms like jcow or buddypress or wikis are not powerful. That's why I said web 2.0 blogs.

Click to expand...

And those site tend to die really quick giving you a negative link lose also.

My only thought is it seems like a waste spending all those resources to create unique articles just to stick them on some crappy web 2.0s. If you're producing decent articles you'd probably see better results with fewer articles if you took a little more time and searched for guest posting opportunities.

Just my 2 cents. In any case nice thread and case study. I'll be following your results. Thanks for the thread.

So you didn't build tier 2 n 3 to the web 2.0's at all? Just letting them indexed is enough?

real ppl giving back to the community. Nice! will keep track

Can you answer this question Kimi?

elschlongo said:

What are you using to create your Web 2.0 properties?

Click to expand...

elschlongo said:

What are you using to create your Web 2.0 properties?

Click to expand...

I would also be happy to find this out

Would love to know about the tool as well.

So more content around my links gives better ranking?

i didnt understand your thread really well OP
can you or anybody who understood it summarize it for me?

cool guide man.

Hi Kimi,

Would love to see an update from website no. 2 and 4, love to follow the thread.

Sigh. Another one who's been brainwashed by Google. Content doesn't matter. Backlinks do. Check the biggest money keywords in your niche. Churn and burn is the way to make money now. If you want to load your website with lots of pretty content then go ahead. Waste of time.

sandhu40 said:

Sigh. Another one who's been brainwashed by Google. Content doesn't matter. Backlinks do. Check the biggest money keywords in your niche. Churn and burn is the way to make money now. If you want to load your website with lots of pretty content then go ahead. Waste of time.

Click to expand...

Wheres your evidence this method doesn't work?

Why create content when you don't need to? High quality content can be time consuming and expensive.