Testing Scrapebox 100K/day blasts with twist

This is getting very confusing LOL. All I can tell right now is that wiki is invincible. Other than that.... i am not so sure about gov and private sites.

Yeah, pretty interesting so far.

the dance is so crazy, but even though it goes back up, it doesn't seem to be a big jump from the starting position.

Yeah, its dancing really randomly.

Maybe you could post info from majesticseo about sites you are blasting ?

I will in next days, really busy here atm.

For my comment I meant wiki not WordPress my bad. That wiki page is freaking un-movable

Yeah

That wikipedia page is insane just brushing the haters off.

lol yeah

Interesting case study.

What url are using for the name anchors? Is the same as the comment anchor?
When you blast 100k blogs how many names are you generate?

Same - I have list of 10K names and emails.

I'd quit this, it'll last forever with the same results.

Thats a spirit! Good luck with your things :eek13:
 
04/12/2012

50K links build today again:

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - 115 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - 24 (starting position = 42)
 
the fact that the Gov page tanked and has remained tanks, is just freakin DUMB. DUMB by G. what a head scratcher at the way they do business..
 
Keep it up. This is all very interesting. Are you planning on continuing to do links, or are you going to let the sites "rest" ever and see if that impacts anything?
 
Just to confirm your anchors; your using just names in both the name and comment fields? great test by the way, always entertaining as well as useful intel... ;)
 
How about a screenshot from ahrefs of all 3 sites? Should take less than 2 minutes.
 
This is amazing haha that Wikipedia page just doesn't care. It eats your spam for breakfast. This is a really great study but I think the real test would be to try this kind of extreme SB link building on a new domain. It's tough to know how many and what kind of backlinks these domains had before you started.
 
Last edited:
Hi Extrawinner, thank you very much for this case study! I'm about to blast my level 2 site using Scrapebox
Could you let me know what tool are you using for pinging backlinks?
 
i've been blasting one of my sites for about a week now with 5k/day.. so far it's on 15th page and not moving much
 
Thank you for running this test, there will certainly be something to learn here (I just hope the big G is not monitoring this thread and playing dirty)
 
05/12/2012

90K links build today again:

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - Not in top500 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Private Site - 32 (starting position = 42)
 
Well.. after about 2 weeks of heavy blasting.. it seems you blasted the gov site into oblivion. I'm not really surprised about the wikipedia page.

What i have to say is surprising IMO is the 3rd site.. Google has taken into account the links, since its been dancing, but yet no siginificant improvement, and no sandbox. Really puzzled by Google...
 
This is really not the type of results I would be expecting from something like this. The government sinks and the people stand tall? Of course, Wikipedia is honey badger and walks it off.

I'm really interested in seeing the outcome of this. I suspect the personal site will eventually tank if the link velocity drops off, or possibly before, but now I'm rooting for it.
 
Are we sure no one else is building really high quality links to the wiki page? I mean you don't have control over who links to websites, and wiki, as it has been, gets lots of links from good websites.
 
The number of referring domains for wikipedia hasn't changed that much compared to the changes of the other 2 sites. Still, it is perfectly immobile and seems immune to negative SEO.
 
Thanks for the update Extra Winner, very interesting case study. Some poor saps are getting their sites sacrificed with links. lol. Free Promotion :D, I have a feeling the consistent blasting is going to have them dance around and once more links index and stick , they will begin to plateau out at the top depending on the link diversity. Just my guess based on the data you've already gathered. +Rep
 
Back
Top