Testing Scrapebox 100K/day blasts with twist

innocent_kid · Nov 27, 2012

can i ask somthing ?

where did u got so huge AA list

skulquake · Nov 27, 2012

This is awesome anyone care to offer up predictions as to where the sites finally end up?
My bets are as follows when the conclusion of the test is over:
site 1: position #3, however I'm curious as to what the other 3 sites are above this wikipedia page? Those are some strong mofos. I would like to reverse engineer their backlink profile. low hanging fruit
site 2: position #21
site 3: position #18

pietpatat · Nov 27, 2012

ExtraWinner said:
I have pinged 20K links today only - if someone knows some app to ping links quickly - let me know please.

Why do you want to ping sb links? Those links are already indexed. No reason to ping

myownhero · Nov 27, 2012

pietpatat said:
Why do you want to ping sb links? Those links are already indexed. No reason to ping

They're indexed without his link, a spider will still have to recrawl the page before it counts.

leeshoes · Nov 28, 2012

Some of these pages will have hundreds and thousands of comments. Im sure somebody else is pinging them already

Brikati · Nov 28, 2012

leeshoes said:
Some of these pages will have hundreds and thousands of comments. Im sure somebody else is pinging them already

Why would you leave your success to blind chance then do it yourself? Sounds foolish to me.

ExtraWinner · Nov 28, 2012

affarmy said:
Interesting development- private site bounced back. I assume you are using various anchors, not the main KWP for all these sites. Pinging: check out megapinger (for windows)

I am using names = regular names with anchor.
In comment anchor = keyword.

radarsurge said:
If I'm not mistaken, he is using the main KW only.

Yeah, within comment.

edotj said:
I Subscribe! I really want to see if it hurt or help your site. Maybe help it in shorter term but hurt in longer terms.

I think other way around actually but we will see.

tenix said:
I feel like the private site is going to crash again in a few weeks and never return though this is very interesting. Keep posting!

I will..

Samui said:
Interesting topic...

One of my sites 10 years old had been blasted with scrapebox by a competitor they used words Viagra, Paypal Viagra etc..I see all these new keywords in my webmasters and 90% of them are from blog comments. We were ranked in top 10 for a strong competitive keyword. Now we not even in the top 500 pages.. So my experience is that blasting a site with spam keywords does do negative SEO..

I wish Google would regard blog comments as 0 in SEO..

I never said I am using negative keywords - just 1 keyword for all comments - one we want to get ranking.

innocent_kid said:
according to my theory
this will happen
u will get all sites penalized
but
their penalisation period will be small
like 1 week max
but when they come ot of penalzisation
they will be on top of their keywords

1 week drop is not penalty - but dance. And they are dancing like crazy coming back and disappearing every few hours (besides Wiki ofc).

innocent_kid said:
can i ask somthing ?
where did u got so huge AA list

BHW, forums, Imglory, few members donated their lists to perform this experiment. I got 1Mil links from donations alone - rest is my private tested and cleaned list.

skulquake said:
This is awesome anyone care to offer up predictions as to where the sites finally end up?
My bets are as follows when the conclusion of the test is over:
site 1: position #3, however I'm curious as to what the other 3 sites are above this wikipedia page? Those are some strong mofos. I would like to reverse engineer their backlink profile. low hanging fruit
site 2: position #21
site 3: position #18

I predict Wiki will stay same, 2 other pages will increase in rankings slightly.

pietpatat said:
Why do you want to ping sb links? Those links are already indexed. No reason to ping

This:

myownhero said:
They're indexed without his link, a spider will still have to recrawl the page before it counts.

Yup.

leeshoes said:
Some of these pages will have hundreds and thousands of comments. Im sure somebody else is pinging them already

This:

MasterZ said:
Why would you leave your success to blind chance then do it yourself? Sounds foolish to me.

Exactly.

ExtraWinner · Nov 28, 2012

26/11/2012

100K links build today. I have been extremely busy yesterday with my new thread so didnt had time to ping any links. Results are as follow:

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - not in top500 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - not in top500 (starting position = 42)

Stufferizer · Nov 28, 2012

The Wiki page is not even changin a bit. Now I am sure that they get a special treatment by G - would you also think that they are on some whitelist?

ExtraWinner said:
26/11/2012
Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - not in top500 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - not in top500 (starting position = 42)

ExtraWinner · Nov 28, 2012

Stufferizer said:
The Wiki page is not even changin a bit. Now I am sure that they get a special treatment by G - would you also think that they are on some whitelist?

Yeah, i cannot recall the name at the moment but they are on the VIP list of some kind. Maybe someone will remind us below what was the name of it again as I am totally blank (7am here...)

xenoxen · Nov 28, 2012

ExtraWinner are you completle sure that your lists are working - you do not verify which links stick, right?
Good test - added to bookmarks.

ExtraWinner · Nov 28, 2012

xenoxen said:
ExtraWinner are you completle sure that your lists are working - you do not verify which links stick, right?
Good test - added to bookmarks.

I am getting 60% "posted" ratio on my list - numbers I am posting are numbers of "Posted" links, not size of my list I try to post to. I am checking them every so to see how many are actually posted and number is around 80%.
So when I say 100K links posted - I actaully try to post 120K (20% more) to cover the loss. Hope that explains it.

kideze · Nov 29, 2012

great test. Looks like the wikipage is just not moving!

fsatark · Nov 29, 2012

Removed - wrong message

ExtraWinner · Nov 30, 2012

30/11/2012

200K links build today. Again - no pinging today as I was busy. I will try to ping all links by tomorrow:

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - 107 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - 22 (starting position = 42)

Site 3 is doing pretty well - gov site is actually performing worse than expected...

GiorgioB · Nov 30, 2012

interesting case study.. difficult to come to conclusions for now except that Wikipedia seems to play by a different set of rules when it comes to backlink SEO. Will keep watch, thanks for the updates op (good to see a case study that doesn't die out after 3-4 days)

affarmy · Nov 30, 2012

EW- You know what would help with this study just a bit more-
Telling us a bit more about the BL profiles of the target sites in question. The results make it seem like the gov site has virtually no links and the private site has a strong BL profile and maybe some age too...

ExtraWinner said:
30/11/2012

200K links build today. Again - no pinging today as I was busy. I will try to ping all links by tomorrow:

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - 107 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - 22 (starting position = 42)

Site 3 is doing pretty well - gov site is actually performing worse than expected...

alterbuu · Dec 1, 2012

I don't think WP plays by different rules i just think their authority is almost perfect and the BL profile is proably rock solid. Check it out on majestic

ExtraWinner · Dec 1, 2012

GiorgioB said:
interesting case study.. difficult to come to conclusions for now except that Wikipedia seems to play by a different set of rules when it comes to backlink SEO. Will keep watch, thanks for the updates op (good to see a case study that doesn't die out after 3-4 days)

No problem

affarmy said:
EW- You know what would help with this study just a bit more-
Telling us a bit more about the BL profiles of the target sites in question. The results make it seem like the gov site has virtually no links and the private site has a strong BL profile and maybe some age too...

I will uypdate this on Monda/Tuesday. Extremely busy here these days...

alterbuu said:
I don't think WP plays by different rules i just think their authority is almost perfect and the BL profile is proably rock solid. Check it out on majestic

Not WP - Wikipedia. Big difference...

ExtraWinner · Dec 1, 2012

01/12/2012

80K links build today. Again - no pinging today as I was busy (we had holiday today here...):

Site 1 - Wikipedia Page - position 4 (starting position = 4)
Site 2 - Government Site - Not in Top 500 (starting position = 36)
Site 3 - Small Private Site - Not in Top 500 (starting position = 42)

And down again.

Testing Scrapebox 100K/day blasts with twist

Power Member

Registered Member

Regular Member

Power Member

Junior Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

Senior Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Supreme Member

Regular Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World