static page or just posts?

Y

yesman23

Registered Member

Sep 9, 2013

87

17

• Nov 25, 2013

• #1

So what tends to rank better blog posts or a static page? Or does it not matter ?

Thank you.

 

Y

yesman23

Registered Member

Sep 9, 2013

87

17

• Nov 25, 2013
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #2

No one here? Lol bumppp

 

lover

Elite Member

Sep 25, 2007

2,444

859

• Nov 25, 2013

• #3

Google ranks pages, go for blog posts.

 

B

Ballan

Junior Member

Oct 29, 2013

114

21

• Nov 25, 2013

• #4

No meaningful difference, though posts are time stamped which seems to give an advantage in suggesting freshness

 

gullsinn

Elite Member

Dec 24, 2009

2,556

2,311

• Nov 25, 2013

• #5

both are easy, but I static page with fast loading speed would be better.

 

dragonlube

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Jan 22, 2011

3,691

784

• Nov 25, 2013

• #6

I always go for static pages for aesthetics, it doesn't affect your rankings one way or another.

 

Adam718

BANNED

Jun 19, 2012

1,401

699

• Nov 25, 2013

• #7

A static page looks more like a website, and post page looks more like a blog. It depends on the look and feel you want for your site and if you want to rank for a few keywords on your home page or individual posts. I prefer static page because it looks better to a user thats looking for information about the topic that they're visiting the site about.

 

M

MadStacks

BANNED

Oct 20, 2013

1,493

494

• Nov 25, 2013

• #8

Simply put both can rank but it depends on what type of site you are wanting to create. Static is best and necessary
for creating a full fledged CMS with WordPress. You can even add a blog page to update and get personal with your visitors.