Spun Content + Manual Proof Reading?

S

ScreamingMidget

Elite Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
2,493
Reaction score
590
I've never really bothered with spun content, but I wonder if anybody has tried spinning an article, but then proofreading it themselves before finally throwing it into Grammarly for more corrections.
 
Advertise on BHW
You need to rewrite even spun content if you want to generate any value. As you can always rewrite without spinning it doesn't make much sense.

I guess for PBN and low tier spam sites spin + proofread might work. For anything valuable, you, unfortunately, need to put work into it.
 
paraztos said:
You need to rewrite even spun content if you want to generate any value.
Click to expand...

Depends on what you mean by value? I wouldn't be talking SEO here so wouldn't be relying on Google ranking.

There are sentences I've seen when I did try spinning that read fine. You just needed to use the correct syntax.

So wouldn't spinning mean less rewriting needed overall?
 
If you are not looking for ranking, then yes it might save you some time. I would say 10-20% maximum though. For me, it's not worth the hassle, but YMMY. Try it and report back if it's working out for you or not.
 
Spinning content and rewriting an article will take you more time than actually researching and writing on your own.
 
SonOfBhw said:
Spinning content and rewriting an article will take you more time than actually researching and writing on your own.
Click to expand...

Yes agreed, you need to pass copyscape type checks.
 
Yes, I have with WordAI. It always needs at least a few touches. If you want to pass Gramarly as well, you're probably better off writing from scratch.
 
Spinning/rewriting will take a lot of time - you can do it if its just a few articles but if you need a lot, better just use expired contents.
 
Yes, after spinning always you have to read the article and edit it before checking with Grammarly.
 
Well, using quillbot helps a lot. Using expired articles is good too if you want google to give you 4 result penalty.

You know, even quetext check on web.archive and can detect expired articles. I would use quillbot + grammarly.
 
Rather invest time in an AI writer tool. Original content with much better results
 
ScreamingMidget said:
I've never really bothered with spun content, but I wonder if anybody has tried spinning an article, but then proofreading it themselves before finally throwing it into Grammarly for more corrections.
Click to expand...
Rewrite + Proofreading + Plagiarism checker + Grammarly
 
Hello, the spun content is not a good idea, but it will be work when we use the best article spinner.. Manual content is a better choice
 
I would be the perfect person to add to this thread. Recently a weird Idea came to my mind. Even though it's completely against my sect of work, i.e., my content agency, still I decided to give this a try. I'm making a site from scratch using two interns + Writesonic + editor + and SEO person.

And just a month passed with 35 articles slapped on, here are the stats.

1642562567863.png
1642563641932.png


And we haven't even given our full potential yet :) This is done in exact same way you asked.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top