spun content just doesn't work

I've tested and I dare to say than unquie content is way better than spun content. I'm not sure how it perform in web 2.0 but for pbn, I strongly recommend u to use unique content. I tested many post of pbn using spun content, the result just isn't as great compared to using unique content.

about something like article builder, is it still working for you?
for backlinks it's still great cheap alternative

mysia7788 said:

I've tested and I dare to say than unquie content is way better than spun content. I'm not sure how it perform in web 2.0 but for pbn, I strongly recommend u to use unique content. I tested many post of pbn using spun content, the result just isn't as great compared to using unique content.

Click to expand...

How a spun content is not unique ? If it passes copyscape and grammarly, how can google tell that it's plag ? They can't.

It depends on a few things:

What type of spinner/re-writer are you using.
Have you checked the spun content with copyscape and grammarly for plag.

I'm using spun/re-writen content on all of my pbns, and that content looks even better than 3$ articles you can buy. I test for plag each paragraph of the article and it's 100% unique according to those 2 plag checkers.

I use spun content and so far its working fine.

I think the problem is that spun is such a broad term that many people here spun and thing auto generated crap from software. I use highly human spun articles made by people that cost around $80 each. Copyscape and TBS say they are good for around 1500 uses.

Yes, Unique Content Always Perform Better.
Here is nothing to recommend.

Spun Content good for tire 2 & 3, not for PBN.

Spun content works. I have tested this multiple times.

Can you say readable content is better? yes

But you cant say spun content doesn't work.

Spun content works but would it convert? I don't think so.

Spun content works, duplicate content works and even unreadable autogenerated content works. You just need to find a method how to make it convert (which isn`t that difficult at all).

Cheers

Depends on the spun output's quality.

clockhouse said:

Spun content works but would it convert? I don't think so.

Click to expand...

I love how many JrVIP's don't have a clue.....

The OP is clearly refering to using spun content for ranking purposes not on a moneysite.

Also just for reference I have rank absolute autogenerated spun crap before and got clicks on adsense ads on it.

Please, quit using spun content because you are obviously using it wrong. The question is how are you using it? If you are posting 3-500 word crap articles then you can expect that it won't work because your whole model is flawed.

Try combining a few QUALITY related articles (keeping in mind the old proverb: "you cannot get chicken salad from chicken sh#* ") into 1 article, run it through WordAI Turing and then use it as Tier 1 content linking to wherever you want to get some link juice. This is the proper use of spun content.

I've been using spun and human written content for tier 1 links, and I can't say there was any noticeable difference. The way I see it, as long as it's readable and unique, there shouldn't be any problems. For PBNs though I think original content would be safest

agree with you

Cheer

As many have already said spun content can serve a purpose. Are you saying that you actually notice a difference between how much link juice is passed from a PBN based on whether the content is spun or human written?

K.H.R said:

Yes, Unique Content Always Perform Better.
Here is nothing to recommend.

Spun Content good for tire 2 & 3, not for PBN.

Click to expand...

Nonsense,If done right it works. How wouldn't it? If the article is unique then how is it any different to writing an article from scratch.If you are really good at spinning there is no difference.

Well...first things first...

Last time I checked the purpose of a PBN is to get a link to your money site. As long as the content is contextual for the subject, I can't see why you would care about the so-called "quality"...

Next...I have talked about content on here multiple times. Here's one post I did:

Content is for users/visitors. Period. If you want them to read it, fine. Personally I only want them to click on my ads so the content is meaningless to me. If you're building lists and relationships, then by all means write that good content till the cows come home. I'm just interested in getting them AS FAST AS POSSIBLE to the products/services they want to buy. STRUCTURE of content matters. Quality doesn't mean shit. CONTENT IS NOT KING.

You guys do not understand math. It is currently IMPOSSIBLE for google to "calculate" whether your content is "quality" or not. With the algo that is. The processing power needed to do that for EVERY piece of content online is astronomical. I will not explain it. It is what it is. Yes, I know they use "on site experience" a.k.a. "What's your bounce rate", but that is EASILY manipulated. OF COURSE, if your site is MANUALLY REVIEWED, that reviewer can see your shitty content and nail you.

SEO TIP OF THE DAY: Stay under the radar and don't go after high competition niches and you will do AWESOME with even the SHITTIEST of content.

I speak from experience. I have DOZENS of sites using 100% Spun Content. These are MONEY sites...YES I SAID "MONEY" SITES.

As I said above...If all you're looking for is a click on a link, then you don't need "quality" content. STRUCTURE matters. Quality doesn't...UNLESS you are trying to create a long term relationship with the visitor, you ABSOLUTELY can rank just as well with crappy content vs. "quality". For organic rankings, LINKS ARE KING. Not content.

For those of you who are newbies...NO this does not work with Adsense...That ended about 6 years ago!

Spun content for pbn is good, the ones that say otherwise may not know what they are doing.

Can you please explain how you beat both copyscape and grammarly for plagiarism?

doncrust said:

Can you please explain how you beat both copyscape and grammarly for plagiarism?

Click to expand...

one way is to spin two or more articles together, but honestley that isn't even nessecary I've often spun just a single article sometimes even with a free spinner and it still passes copyscape and grammarly.

Oh and keep in mind that googles refers to content as being everything including text, images and video NOT just the text