{SPLIT TEST} Indexing service INSTANTLINKINDEXER vs.

Hey, I can add some value to the thread because I'm using both of those indexers right now. I'm using indexers only for web2.0 like wordpress, jigsy, jimodo, weebly etc.

4 months ago I was using instalinkindexer, it was indexing about 25% which was quite good, then after 2 months of using it it started to get worse and worse, till it was indexing only about 5%, then I decided to try something different.

Bought onehourindexer, it was indexing 50%~ and I was really surprised, but good things don't last for long... After 1 month it dropped to about 2-5%.

And as of currently I ran my campaigns for the last month on both onehour and instalinkindexer, after 3 weeks less than 3-4% of links indexed, really disappointed, I'm done with those indexers, will get a gsa or sb list and index links that way...

LeanLow said:

Hey, I can add some value to the thread because I'm using both of those indexers right now. I'm using indexers only for web2.0 like wordpress, jigsy, jimodo, weebly etc.

4 months ago I was using instalinkindexer, it was indexing about 25% which was quite good, then after 2 months of using it it started to get worse and worse, till it was indexing only about 5%, then I decided to try something different.

Bought onehourindexer, it was indexing 50%~ and I was really surprised, but good things don't last for long... After 1 month it dropped to about 2-5%.

And as of currently I ran my campaigns for the last month on both onehour and instalinkindexer, after 3 weeks less than 3-4% of links indexed, really disappointed, I'm done with those indexers, will get a gsa or sb list and index links that way...

Click to expand...

Thanks for your input. Google patched some methods for instant indexing, that is the reason why you face this drop. But this is not the customer's problem, the indexing providers need to do asap something about this. And i am sure this 5% of your indexed links got indexed not from the service, this was the result of natural indexing.

Web 2.0 links are easy to index if you have decent content on them, i just build links to them and all are indexed in max 7 days, that is also what i recommend for you.

Some profile links and harder indexable platforms getting not indexed for weeks, there is a place when indexing services shine - NOT. My philosophy is that i need the indexing service for links, that are not or harder indexable by nature of the hosting platform and not for the links, that are easy indexable naturally.

They failed miserably - i have wasted a monthly subscription on both of them to justify my point with this case study, but that's fine may is saved for other members some bucks for more content or for 2 cinema tickets...

NEW UPDATE!

Wanted to bring some new data, but there is really nothing changed. Do you think it is pointless to continue with the test?

[TABLE="width: 600, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD]Service
[/TD]
[TD]July 10. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 14. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 17. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 20. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 27. 2015
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]InstantLinkIndexer
[/TD]
[TD]500/2
[/TD]
[TD]500/3
[/TD]
[TD]500/3
[/TD]
[TD]?
[/TD]
[TD]?
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]OneHourIndexing
[/TD]
[TD]500/0
[/TD]
[TD]500/0
[/TD]
[TD]500/0
[/TD]
[TD]?
[/TD]
[TD]?
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

robibrk said:

NEW UPDATE!

Wanted to bring some new data, but there is really nothing changed. Do you think it is pointless to continue with the test?

[TABLE="width: 600, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD]Service
[/TD]
[TD]July 10. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 14. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 17. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 20. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 27. 2015[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]InstantLinkIndexer[/TD]
[TD]500/2[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]OneHourIndexing[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Click to expand...

Please continue for at least few more weeks so we know for sure.

robibrk said:

NEW UPDATE!

Wanted to bring some new data, but there is really nothing changed. Do you think it is pointless to continue with the test?

[TABLE="width: 600, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD]Service
[/TD]
[TD]July 10. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 14. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 17. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 20. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 27. 2015[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]InstantLinkIndexer[/TD]
[TD]500/2[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]OneHourIndexing[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Click to expand...

Please continue for at least 2 more weeks so we know for sure.

LeanLow said:

Please continue for at least few more weeks so we know for sure.

Click to expand...

I agree! Let the case study finish 1 month later (August 10th). I doubt there will be any significant changes though. But if a service cannot index links within 1 month, then it is totally useless.

Okay guys i will continue monitoring the links and will update as described on my table date.

Wow the results are crazy. F*ck you google. Why they just let it like before ?
Even hq links are hard to get indexed, and i think google loves "good" content with links.

NEW UPDATE!

I have nothing to comment...

[TABLE="width: 600"]
[TR]
[TD]Service
[/TD]
[TD]July 10. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 14. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 17. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 21. 2015
[/TD]
[TD]July 27. 2015 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]InstantLinkIndexer[/TD]
[TD]500/2[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]500/3[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]OneHourIndexing[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]500/0[/TD]
[TD]?[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Solid gold. Keep the updates coming!

Tangy said:

Solid gold. Keep the updates coming!

Click to expand...

I keep the results till 1.-st next month only, due my 2 week vacation and i will be away w/o access to SB and other tools. After the vacation i post the last update.

I am not gonna update anymore, the results are not changed and is clear, that indexing services are WASTE OF YOUR MONEY.

Sames there are still a lot of users, that are using indexing services, thats fine, but it is like you pay for pure nothing.

Think about to test your indexing service provider and decide if is worth the money...