SPKs bot Params

laziestnoob · Mar 10, 2012

hey the thread was removed. does anyone have/know what the Params were? since he stated the default was incorrect. i forgot to copy down the correct ones. ty

UPDATE:
for lazy people. here are major info supplied from replies.

RAR file password is: spkizpro
Default Setting should be: -U t -D 1

buchner · Mar 10, 2012

I do not know if this is correct but this is from the CMD version

-D 1 -p %1 -U

laziestnoob · Mar 10, 2012

ah that looks right but without the %1. dont remember ever typing that. tyvm. if any1 can confirm that would be great

thedon23 · Mar 10, 2012

Yeah, just take out the 1%, and that's it.

Btw, I don't know much about YouTube, so quick question..I'm going to be running this for a friend of mine who does seem YouTube stuff. I don't wanna risk his account though. I know YouTube removes a lot of videos if they get too many views in a short period of time. Do they simply remove the individual video, or do they ban the individuals account as a whole?

laziestnoob · Mar 10, 2012

i wouldnt risk it. ill tell you right now i wouldnt use this on my partner'd channel. but i know u can test this via boost Raywilliamjohnsons videos. he wont get banned but u can give him an earfull

Kickflip · Mar 10, 2012

thedon23 said:
Yeah, just take out the 1%, and that's it.

Btw, I don't know much about YouTube, so quick question..I'm going to be running this for a friend of mine who does seem YouTube stuff. I don't wanna risk his account though. I know YouTube removes a lot of videos if they get too many views in a short period of time. Do they simply remove the individual video, or do they ban the individuals account as a whole?

Can be both (banned/deleted). Not worth the risk on a legitimate account.

buchner · Mar 10, 2012

@thedon23 The video should be the one tooken down, not the account. Most that would happen to the account is a TOS violation.

EisaG · Mar 10, 2012

Recommended settings:
I was testing a few stuff so the default settings are wrong. Set the params to "-U t -D 1" and delay to 2500, and threads to 15. (or more if you wish). Also put "view link X times" to 500.

tempguy123 · Mar 10, 2012

How can people make assumptions about being disabled??? The programs have been out for about 2 days...

I've heard about 2 stories about accounts being deleted, but out of the 1,000s it seems to be fine.

I've heard videos get removed, but only once they reached the millions. Still, that is beside the point, it is way too early to be making assumptions

Eaglez · Mar 10, 2012

Can anyone re-up the bot?

Kickflip · Mar 10, 2012

tempguy123 said:
How can people make assumptions about being disabled??? The programs have been out for about 2 days...

I've heard about 2 stories about accounts being deleted, but out of the 1,000s it seems to be fine.

I've heard videos get removed, but only once they reached the millions. Still, that is beside the point, it is way too early to be making assumptions

We know, because we have seen it with our own eyes. YouTube most likely has to manually moderate them and make the decision based on the persons channel, any discussion the video is generating, and their own personal opinion. So if the YouTube moderator decides your video is gone, its gone. The accounts which are being banned completely, are mostly new accounts, or accounts with no other good quality videos on the accounts, but is it even close to worth the risk?

Risk VS Reward. Putting an extra 50,000 bot views on a legit channel probably isn't going to provide any real reward, and you risk not being accepted into partner program in future if they suspect your account is "shady". If someone wants to build a legitimate YouTube channel, go white hat and put the effort it. It will pay off much more in the long run, and you dont have to worry about losing your account over a small mistake you cant take back.

laziestnoob · Mar 10, 2012

man why was SPK suspended. people getting butthurt and reporting him? zzz this forum lol

lafflady · Mar 10, 2012

I thought SPK said we would not get banned as long as we stayed under the radar of 100K/video. I have a handful of videos I boosted 5-20K hits to over the past day. These are legit videos with original content. I hope its not going to be a problem for my account.

laziestnoob · Mar 10, 2012

So what does changing the defualt to -U t -D 1 actually do? because i noticed i can do far more views/sec with default. but do they still count? whats the change

dekadent30 · Mar 10, 2012

i can't connect to my dedi server after using spk bot, is this a virus ? Support rebooted my dedi and i still can't connect

tempguy123 · Mar 10, 2012

Kickflip said:
We know, because we have seen it with our own eyes. YouTube most likely has to manually moderate them and make the decision based on the persons channel, any discussion the video is generating, and their own personal opinion. So if the YouTube moderator decides your video is gone, its gone. The accounts which are being banned completely, are mostly new accounts, or accounts with no other good quality videos on the accounts, but is it even close to worth the risk?

Risk VS Reward. Putting an extra 50,000 bot views on a legit channel probably isn't going to provide any real reward, and you risk not being accepted into partner program in future if they suspect your account is "shady". If someone wants to build a legitimate YouTube channel, go white hat and put the effort it. It will pay off much more in the long run, and you dont have to worry about losing your account over a small mistake you cant take back.

So you make assumptions based on being banned? How do you know it was not another factor?

Also, you seem to be wrong, YouTube DO NOT MODERATOR each individual video, where did you get that information from?

Do you understand that millions of videos are uploaded to youtube every single day, hence why they have "bots" in place and not humans.

They cannot look at the channel and say "ok, well this guy has gotten 700k views from mobile and he ususally gets 100 views" Because there are DIFFERENT WAYS of getting those views naturally. Shoutouts are a classic example.

You are also stating that methods used to increase views are unethical, however it is how bigger youtubers have done, making it INCREADIBLY hard to get anywhere (even if you produce amazing content).

Kickflip · Mar 10, 2012

tempguy123 said:
So you make assumptions based on being banned? How do you know it was not another factor?

Also, you seem to be wrong, YouTube DO NOT MODERATOR each individual video, where did you get that information from?

Do you understand that millions of videos are uploaded to youtube every single day, hence why they have "bots" in place and not humans.

They cannot look at the channel and say "ok, well this guy has gotten 700k views from mobile and he ususally gets 100 views" Because there are DIFFERENT WAYS of getting those views naturally. Shoutouts are a classic example.

You are also stating that methods used to increase views are unethical, however it is how bigger youtubers have done, making it INCREADIBLY hard to get anywhere (even if you produce amazing content).

Lol, you crazy man.

YouTube doesn't need to moderate every video, and I never said they would do that. But they can surely afford to manually moderate every video with 300k+ views in a day. Doesn't take that much resources, and YouTube has more than enough people/money to afford it. If a terrible video gets to the front page and gets suggested to users, it ruins their YouTube experience, and costs YouTube money. Do you really think YouTube doesn't have any real people working for them? One employee making $6.00/hour can moderate hundreds of videos daily. I think YouTube can spare it.

Have you ever seen the backend of YouTube which the moderators and developers have access to? Ever seen their algorithms? Do you know their parameters for what is considered a good or bad video (profit wise)? They CAN just look at a channel, and easily be able to tell if the views are legitimate or not. They don't have to PROVE it 100% in a court of law, just to their own satisfaction according to their set guidelines.

It is unethical to buy views. Just because everyone else does it, doesn't make it ethical. It is unethical, because you are contributing to making it even harder for people to "get somewhere" on youtube. Everyone should have as even playing field as possible. This isn't a lesson in ethics though, because this is a blackhat forum. But if you think cheating is ethical just because all the top guys are doing it, then I don't think we need to discuss anything further between us.

tempguy123 · Mar 10, 2012

Kickflip said:
Lol, you crazy man.

YouTube doesn't need to moderate every video, and I never said they would do that. But they can surely afford to manually moderate every video with 300k+ views in a day. Doesn't take that much resources, and YouTube has more than enough people/money to afford it. If a terrible video gets to the front page and gets suggested to users, it ruins their YouTube experience, and costs YouTube money. Do you really think YouTube doesn't have any real people working for them? One employee making $6.00/hour can moderate hundreds of videos daily. I think YouTube can spare it.

Have you ever seen the backend of YouTube which the moderators and developers have access to? Ever seen their algorithms? Do you know their parameters for what is considered a good or bad video (profit wise)? They CAN just look at a channel, and easily be able to tell if the views are legitimate or not. They don't have to PROVE it 100% in a court of law, just to their own satisfaction according to their set guidelines.

It is unethical to buy views. Just because everyone else does it, doesn't make it ethical. It is unethical, because you are contributing to making it even harder for people to "get somewhere" on youtube. Everyone should have as even playing field as possible. This isn't a lesson in ethics though, because this is a blackhat forum. But if you think cheating is ethical just because all the top guys are doing it, then I don't think we need to discuss anything further between us.

You have no sources on what YouTube do or do not do, you simply make assumptions, your argument is invalid.

Whether it is unethical to get views is up to an individual, their experience and what they do.

Nevertheless, let us not get offtopic here and talk about what this thread was created for, THE PARAMS!

appache · Mar 10, 2012

Kickflip said:
Lol, you crazy man.

YouTube doesn't need to moderate every video, and I never said they would do that. But they can surely afford to manually moderate every video with 300k+ views in a day. Doesn't take that much resources, and YouTube has more than enough people/money to afford it. If a terrible video gets to the front page and gets suggested to users, it ruins their YouTube experience, and costs YouTube money. Do you really think YouTube doesn't have any real people working for them? One employee making $6.00/hour can moderate hundreds of videos daily. I think YouTube can spare it.

Have you ever seen the backend of YouTube which the moderators and developers have access to? Ever seen their algorithms? Do you know their parameters for what is considered a good or bad video (profit wise)? They CAN just look at a channel, and easily be able to tell if the views are legitimate or not. They don't have to PROVE it 100% in a court of law, just to their own satisfaction according to their set guidelines.

It is unethical to buy views. Just because everyone else does it, doesn't make it ethical. It is unethical, because you are contributing to making it even harder for people to "get somewhere" on youtube. Everyone should have as even playing field as possible. This isn't a lesson in ethics though, because this is a blackhat forum. But if you think cheating is ethical just because all the top guys are doing it, then I don't think we need to discuss anything further between us.

Yo - seriously, been around the block enough to know that most of the shit over there is automated, even email communication. The same emails get sent out constantly for example, even with different replies. Besides the point.

The videos getting banned / accounts, are most likely pure idiots frontpaging their shit with a REFF url in their description, totally unrelated to anything in there.

Come on man - Next you'll tell me you have not seen em?

And by the way - please elaborate HOW YOUTUBE LOSES MONEY ON THIS?! Wtf.... Asides from bandwidth usage, nothing happens really. If they REALLY were heammoraghing money - they would have fixed it.

Seeing how even VEVO ACCOUNTS use shit likes this should put your ethics in check as to what is marketing on there.

dekadent30 · Mar 10, 2012

what was the password for rar file anybody rmember?, fucking avast deleted my bot i must unpack it again

SPKs bot Params

Regular Member

Junior Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

Regular Member

BANNED

Junior Member

BANNED

BANNED

Newbie

BANNED

Regular Member

Regular Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

BANNED

BANNED

BANNED

Regular Member

Elite Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World