Some facts about WIKIPEDIA.

J-S-T

Supreme Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
656
Found these Facts of WIKI

Top Facts about Wikipedia :


Wikipedia was started in January 2001. Jimmy Donal is the co- founder and promoter of Wikipedia.

1. Wikipedia is non-profit organization.

2. In wikipedia anyone can sign up and become a wikipedia editor.

3. In wikipedia articles are available in over 285 languages.

4. The English language wikipedia has more than 3+ million articles.

5. In wikipedia there are only 35 Employees.

6. Wikipedia headquarters located in San Francisco.

7. The Wikipedia servers are hosted in Florida.

8. Wikipedia site has more than 684 million page views each year.

9. Wikipedia contributers have written more than 22 million articles.

10. Wikipedia is the only site who does not have ads!
 
Sure, they don't have traditional ads, but how many times have you been on wikipedia and seen this jerk-off staring at you, begging for money?

YeWJi.jpg
 
But i still gave you +rep(now you are green) because i'm drunk and i can see that you are trying to help the community. More unuseful threads like that, i'm taking it back lol
 
But i still gave you +rep(now you are green) because i'm drunk and i can see that you are trying to help the community. More unuseful threads like that, i'm taking it back lol

Since the date i joined this forum, Every Second i spend here, i learn something,

I am not an IM expert so i am sharing other stuffs that i find usefull .:D
 
Several of my sites dont have ads, so I disagree with no 10.

11/ Wikipedia is one of the only sites that pops up heartstring pulling begging leathers on a constant basis.
 
Being on Wikipedia is a must but is not important for SEO. For sure you need to understand that are persons like Jimmy Donal that are just promoting their ideas and not so important to earn money from them. Be sure tho that all the information published in the name of all the institutions and governments are paid with some small fees and the sustaining and the profit of Wikipedia is assured more than enough.
 
I wonder if Wikipedia could add Adsense on its pages, it would be top earning site in the world.

Livestrong might be the top adsense earner. huge ass blocks of adsense/ads with countless pages that rank 1st page
 
Last edited:
Every time some cunt reverts my edits I look at that picture of Jimmy Wales begging for money and I say to myself "FUCK YOU Jimmy Wales. I ain't giving you jack shit."

Here's another "fact" for your list:

11) Wikipedia is the only place where a completely ignorant jackass with no talent in any area can still be successful.

Or words to that effect. These people remind me of cops, or government employees, dutifully going through the motions, grinding out each day, day after day with no passion, no glimmer of intelligence just a blind obedience to whatever programming they have been given. They don't notice when implementation of wikipedia policy veers off into Retardville, and do not care when you let them know it.

For example, sourced material. Wiki policy is that only reliably sourced material can be used. The fact that the "reliably sourced material" is fucking WRONG makes no difference. They don't give a fuck if it's wrong. If CNN said it, then that's what's in the wiki article. I like reading wiki; it's a good reference. And I like reading the discussion pages, and sometimes throw in my own two-cents, but as far as putting any significant effort into doing any substantive work on wikipedia? FUCK NO. Some 14 yo wiseass with nothing to do all day but revert other people's edits for the stupidest, most inane reasons imaginable will actually sit there, all day long, and revert edits for the stupidest, most inane reasons imaginable.

Read the Discussion Pages on any controversial subject, and see how retarded some of the arguments are, and how frequently the retards win. Usually it's because "if we do it that way, "x" group will be offended..." but only if "x" group is one of the traditional liberal/left wing/socialist defined "minorities". They don't give a fuck about men, whites, western religions or anyone associated with them with being offended. Look at what they did to the traditional "BC/AD" format of time (years). Now it's "BCE" and "<something else, I forget>" because apparantly some non-judeo christian cultures have a problem with using (Jesus) Christ as the reference point for all time. But that doesn't stop them from actually USING the numbering system, No, they just want the word "Christ" removed from it. How fucking stupid. What's year "0"? Well originally it marked the entrance of what one religion thought of as the "Messiah", but we don't call it that as it offends other cultures & religions. Oh, we still use the date as a starting point, but we just took that word "Christ" out. How fucking stupid. I figure, when a culture invents the concept of "time" and records "time" with accuracy, and can count backwards hundreds and thousands of years and other cultures are still trying to figure-out how to buttfuck a rhesus monkey and not get AIDS, well I figure that culture WINS and they can call their invention anything they fucking want.

But no, all these also-rans and never-trieds come in LONG after the fact and piss and moan on wikipedia and suddenly it's called the "Common Era".

What the fuck does the birth of the so-called jewish Messiah have in "Common" with anything.

"Hey, guess what?"
"What?"
"This dude Jesus was born, and we're calling it year 0."
Really? Wow, now we have something in common with everyone.
But, we're not going to use the word "Christ"; we're just going to call it "Common"
"Makes sense to me."

- Two Retarded Wikipedia Retards, redefining how time is measured

I don't really give a monkey-fucking rat's ass if "christ" is there or not, but if you are going to object to the notion that the maybe-he-was-and-maybe-he-wasn't jewish messiah as the primary reference point of the entire timeline, then OBJECT to it, don't just do some half-ass, namby-pamby, touchie-feelie bullshit measure, FUCK. Make some celestial event year 0, or some historical event. Maybe the detonation of the 1st atomic bomb could be "BN" (Before Nuclear) or whatever. I don't care. I DO care that these stupid motherfuckers have the ability to influence other people that show up to wikipedia thinking that they are learning something when instead they are being indoctrinated into thinking just like the two retards that defined things like "BCE" and "CE".
 
Last edited:
Every time some cunt reverts my edits I look at that picture of Jimmy Wales begging for money and I say to myself "FUCK YOU Jimmy Wales. I ain't giving you jack shit."

Here's another "fact" for your list:

11) Wikipedia is the only place where a completely ignorant jackass with no talent in any area can still be successful.

Or words to that effect. These people remind me of cops, or government employees, dutifully going through the motions, grinding out each day, day after day with no passion, no glimmer of intelligence just a blind obedience to whatever programming they have been given. They don't notice when implementation of wikipedia policy veers off into Retardville, and do not care when you let them know it.

For example, sourced material. Wiki policy is that only reliably sourced material can be used. The fact that the "reliably sourced material" is fucking WRONG makes no difference. They don't give a fuck if it's wrong. If CNN said it, then that's what's in the wiki article. I like reading wiki; it's a good reference. And I like reading the discussion pages, and sometimes throw in my own two-cents, but as far as putting any significant effort into doing any substantive work on wikipedia? FUCK NO. Some 14 yo wiseass with nothing to do all day but revert other people's edits for the stupidest, most inane reasons imaginable will actually sit there, all day long, and revert edits for the stupidest, most inane reasons imaginable.

Read the Discussion Pages on any controversial subject, and see how retarded some of the arguments are, and how frequently the retards win. Usually it's because "if we do it that way, "x" group will be offended..." but only if "x" group is one of the traditional liberal/left wing/socialist defined "minorities". They don't give a fuck about men, whites, western religions or anyone associated with them with being offended. Look at what they did to the traditional "BC/AD" format of time (years). Now it's "BCE" and "<something else, I forget>" because apparantly some non-judeo christian cultures have a problem with using (Jesus) Christ as the reference point for all time. But that doesn't stop them from actually USING the numbering system, No, they just want the word "Christ" removed from it. How fucking stupid. What's year "0"? Well originally it marked the entrance of what one religion thought of as the "Messiah", but we don't call it that as it offends other cultures & religions. Oh, we still use the date as a starting point, but we just took that word "Christ" out. How fucking stupid. I figure, when a culture invents the concept of "time" and records "time" with accuracy, and can count backwards hundreds and thousands of years and other cultures are still trying to figure-out how to buttfuck a rhesus monkey and not get AIDS, well I figure that culture WINS and they can call their invention anything they fucking want.

But no, all these also-rans and never-trieds come in LONG after the fact and piss and moan on wikipedia and suddenly it's called the "Common Era".

What the fuck does the birth of the so-called jewish Messiah have in "Common" with anything.

"Hey, guess what?"
"What?"
"This dude Jesus was born, and we're calling it year 0."
Really? Wow, now we have something in common with everyone.
But, we're not going to use the word "Christ"; we're just going to call it "Common"
"Makes sense to me."

- Two Retarded Wikipedia Retards, redefining how time is measured

I don't really give a monkey-fucking rat's ass if "christ" is there or not, but if you are going to object to the notion that the maybe-he-way-and-maybe-he-wasn't jewish messiah as the starting point of the entire timeline, then OBJECT to it, don't just do some half-ass, namby-pamby, touchie-feelie bullshit measure, FUCK. Make some celestial event year 0, or some historical event. Maybe the detonation of the 1st atomic bomb could be "BN" (Before Nuclear) or whatever. I don't care. I DO care that these stupid motherfuckers have the ability to influence other people that show up to wikipedia thinking that they are learning something when instead they are being indoctrinated into thinking just like the two retards that defined things like "BCE" and "CE".

i bet that took you half hour to write. ;)
 
Wikipedia is full of mistakes. Once a person with knowledge contributes it is wiped off when no references are offered.
 
Hi ... The wicked W is not the only site with no ads. Maybe it's the only very large site with no ads. Take W down, spread the information across a thousand sites, to make it manageable, and move forward. dgp
 
Back
Top