- Apr 21, 2025
- 426
- 110
Do you guys ever notice some accounts just hold up better than others no matter what you do? Feels like it’s decided the moment you create them.
Some accounts just work better than others any idea why
- Thread starter BitBrowser 1
- Start date
- Aug 15, 2014
- 4,081
- 3,885
Those you make with their signature xD
- Jul 22, 2023
- 1,228
- 206
yes it happens
CashPhantom
BANNED
- Jun 2, 2025
- 394
- 149
old accounts or ones with history always do better
- Apr 21, 2025
- 426
- 110
Recently, many new Reddit accounts got banned. But one account with a year-long history is still safe. It can post certain comments or switch VPN nodes without getting banned.
Incomterm
Registered Member
- Jul 16, 2025
- 55
- 19
Yeah, that’s a real thing — and it’s mostly early trust signals compounding.
Accounts that “hold up” usually start with cleaner signals: stable environment, consistent behavior, normal pacing, and no early red flags. Platforms build a baseline trust profile very early, and everything after is weighted against that. Once an account starts on the wrong foot, it’s fighting gravity the whole time.
It’s less “luck” than first impressions at scale — and those are hard to undo.
- Feb 18, 2025
- 1,941
- 450
Which social media are you referring to? In addition; when you are talking about accounts; are you referring to exposure when uploading content?
FIDO AGENCY
BANNED
- Apr 9, 2025
- 575
- 44
You’re absolutely right. It’s not just luck; it’s about the 'Account Trust Score.' Accounts that consistently survive sweeps usually have two things in common: A solid spending history and consistent daily activity. Meta’s algorithm favors accounts that behave predictably and show a clear history of successful transactions. When an account has been spending and engaging regularly for years, it builds a reputation that acts as a shield against sudden flags. That’s why at FiDO Agency, we focus on aged accounts with high credibility—they’re literally built to withstand the pressure.