1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

So I bought Spin Rewriter... my review.

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by ThopHayt, Jun 19, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ThopHayt

    ThopHayt Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,402
    Likes Received:
    1,645
    For those who don't know it's yet another article spinning tool, same a Spin Chimp or TBS... Bought it on the advice of a friend who claimed that my spins were "too unreadable" last week.

    One thing you'll notice right away is that it's all done over your browser. You don't get to download ANYTHING to your desktop. I didn't know that when I bought it, but I guess it's not a big deal. The big thing with this article spinner is it claims to be able to spin material. Here is an example of what it spits out... you'll notice that it is fairly readable but not quite as unique as what you could get by blasting TBS or Spin Chief on loose settings:

    Original sentence: People like reading reviews that are posted on forums.

    Code:
    {People|Individuals} like {reading|checking out|reviewing|browsing|going through} {reviews|evaluations|assessments|write-ups} that are {posted|uploaded|articled} on {forums|online forums}.
    Nothing too mind blowing. It is quite good at keeping the context of the sentence in place, so it's nice for when I want to post articles that need to be manually approved. It also does multi-level spinning, as you'll see in most the other newer spinning tools around.

    Overall I can boil it down to the simple fact that it is quite solid at doing quick low-uniqueness spins for highly readable submissions, but seems to lack the ability to dial it up on the uniqueness at the expense of the credibility. Which is to say this tool is very good at what it does, but is not super flexible. So I still use SC for my gibberish spins that need to be really unique. I'm not uber high on it, but for the price it definitely is NOT bad.

    They also like to pimp other deals and WSO stuff each time you visit the site to use your tool. I'm not REAL big on that, since I feel like I already paid for it so why do I need to be bombarded with ad's... but they aren't bad. They also give you a reference link, mine's http://www.spinrewriter.com/ for instance, not that I'm pimping anything... just an example of the fact that since it's a web app you're going to essentially get the 3rd degree of ad's and promotions.

    So finally I'm going to rate it a 73%. Definitely not bad... it does one thing VERY well, but because it lacks the ability to gibberish spam highly unique spins as well as it's highly readable less unique spins I can't give it the super high score it would otherwise get. It is probably good for non-English speakers who can't do readable manual spins, but if you want a magic all-in-one this isn't it. It's just good at one job.

    *EDIT* Now that I think about it 73% is probably a bit harsh... it probably deserves more of an upper 70's score like a 78/100 since it really is quite good at what it does do. I just wish they'd include the low-end basic abilities as well as the fancy footing that it is known for.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2012
  2. ferma231

    ferma231 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,698
    Likes Received:
    3,508
    Location:
    Internet
    70% unique rate ?

    I couldnt get that big with spinable sentences and words inside sentences, i used Spinnerchief and hand written spun article
     
  3. ThopHayt

    ThopHayt Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,402
    Likes Received:
    1,645
    Yeah I'm not even sure what percentage they are unique on average on the default setting, but it probably isn't super high. Mostly I bought it for a "lazy tool" for when I don't have time for hand spinning or messing around with stuff. It's amazing that there isn't anything out there that has the AI to do both very high unique and readability but I think Google isn't quite THAT anal yet. But I'd love for something bigger to come out... make my life a bit easier.
     
  4. freller

    freller Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    65
    I regret taking the annual deal on SpinRewriter when it was first available because it's continued to disappoint even after the 'AI' updates. Absolutely nothing special over any normal spinner and often worse. I won't be taking up any new deal.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Swenne

    Swenne Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    28
    Home Page:
    It's a spinner and you will need to rewrite a bit by yourself, but I use it and it's cheap and works good.
    Compare to spinnerchief and the bestspinner, spinrewriter is not worse.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. ActionTaker

    ActionTaker Power Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    209
    Really...? You HAD to share your affiliate link. That's against the rules and you know it, though you tried to sneak it in anyway.
     
  7. internetfree

    internetfree Junior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    43
    Occupation:
    backlinking
    Location:
    Internet
    Home Page:
    The Best Spinner is my number one for that kind of jobs...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. twilightofidols

    twilightofidols Power Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    223
    Proper word context has always been an issue with spinners. I'm convinced that word level spinning is virtually useless for SEO purposes. If a tool like this could spin on the sentence level I would give that programmer a very big trophy.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. LBrown

    LBrown Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,109
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketer - Full Timer
    Location:
    The Land of the Brave
    Spin rewriter does this, sort of.

    [​IMG]

    I only tried it with a super long article and it crashed so I'm not sure how functional it is. It might work better with a shorter article.

    Overall Spin Rewriter suits my needs very well and I prefer it to TBS and SpinnerChief.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. futurestic06

    futurestic06 Supreme Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,204
    Likes Received:
    146
    Look dude these articles are used for link building only so I think 50% uniqueness is very enough :). I don't use this software but use I allows those which are 50% unique and still they haven't created any kind of problem.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. artificial_genius

    artificial_genius Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    314
    Home Page:
    WordAi does this:
    I'll take my trophy! :)
     
  12. danny1

    danny1 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    112
    I've tested Word Ai, and was disappointed. I tested using various articles using different settings and created articles ranging from readable to very unreadable. None of the articles passed CopyScape, so if the software that you're promoting is Word Ai, then it's not human quality and super unique at the same time.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2012
  13. Ninety9media

    Ninety9media Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2012
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    13
    I had the trial offer for a week, I think? the articles were very readable but never passed copyscape without some manual tweaking

    so i was a bit dissapointed
     
  14. Vusal

    Vusal Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    1
    You shouldn't care about Copyscape too much,
     
  15. smallbusinessguy

    smallbusinessguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    14
    Sorry to bring up this old thread. But I am seeing advertisement for Version 3. Anyone has experience with v3 and whether it's better?
     
  16. Panther28

    Panther28 Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,268
    Likes Received:
    3,405
    Occupation:
    Internet.
    Location:
    Internet.
    Yes I use V3, and think its great, although I don't use spinners to automatically spit out what they think, everyone of them seem to spit out garbage.

    spin rewriter has the quickest way to do a manual re-write, which is what i use it for, and has a few other great features that the others don't have.

    Your best trying all the spinners though, everyone uses them differently, so whatever fits you best.
     
  17. irmscher

    irmscher Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    128
    Spin Rewriter 3 is very good, it's generating very quality articles with 99% uniqueness with a click of a mouse, the only problem is the speed of rewriting - sometimes it takes 8 minutes to rewrite 500 word articles.
     
  18. drywallrob

    drywallrob Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    476
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk 21364618037.897791.jpg
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  19. Devilfish1688

    Devilfish1688 Power Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2013
    Messages:
    760
    Likes Received:
    38
    Home Page:
    I also using it but problem hard to get it near unique level....I have readers can tell I taken from somewhere the articles like copy , take from others etc.

    I tired different settings hard to get it readable ..put to readable level people can see is copy from somewhere. Hm..
     
  20. Apricot

    Apricot Administrator Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    11,970
    Likes Received:
    6,473
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    BHW Moderator
    Location:
    London
    Home Page:
    Don't bump ancient threads please.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.