Here's some food for thought...
What do people think "high quality content" is though? I feel like it's being tossed around a little too lightly.
Let's use Google algorithm against itself here
(since google is in charge of determining what goes into the featured snipper
)
When I search for "what is high quality web content?" on Google, I get the following answer from Google basically (the original post doesn't even have that in it):
- "Quality content is original, purposeful, and correctly optimized information that people and search engines are driven to read, view, and share."
Analyze the shit out of it! Start with making sure you know what the words even mean first. If I had to write the perfect answer from the top of my head right here and now with 100% accuracy with my life at stake, I'd save them the trouble and end myself by myself. Find me an idiot who would know that stuff without thorough research - human brain is not limitless. The process of analyzing in itself is probably harder than writing actually. Starting with the seemingly simple things and ending with stuff you never knew even existed as they reveal themselves in the process of analyzing.
What it actually means to analyze something?
What is "original?"
What is "purposeful"?
What is "correcty optimized information"?
Who are "people"?
What is "seach engine"?
What is...
...
One can find out about

more than a trillion things if it was analyzed way too much.
And at last comes the final question, now knowing EVERYTHING about

:
- What's the purpose for writing that content and how can I use that
for my advantage?
This is why AI will write the perfect content one day... But until that becomes a reality, every1 is trying their best. Most don't bother with any of that and instead churn out utter shit thinking they know all the secrets, which is more like playing lottery. It's much easier to have sufficient and UPDATED knowledge when writing the content because the logic behind it is this:
A blind man vs equivalent except with eyes going from A to B - who's more likely to make it first?
And then I just write is how for example I keep up the content game.
(I'd rather not reveal my own research on this...)