Serverless functions - overrared? What do you think?

I think..

  • serverless functions are bad

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • serverless functions are great, i'll explain why

    Votes: 4 66.7%

  • Total voters
    6

Gogol

Administrator
Staff member
Moderator
Executive VIP
Jr. VIP
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
11,838
Reaction score
26,689
I mean, first of all, they can have cold starts, which sucks. Then they can be costly, and can potentially ruin your business. But I still see many companies and known teams/devs using them. What is your opinion on this?

I think the cold start could be absorbed by having another proxy server that caches the request, but why not just have that proxy server fetch your data then? :p
 
Last edited:
I want to like them especially as it seems to be the way the industry is moving but I can't help but think why am I bothering I can just do x,y,z but then I worry I'm becoming an old stale fart.
 
I voted yes, because of the possibility to run stuff scalable near customers on the edge. But who am I to judge the mighty Gogol, sorry .. =( Cloudflare and Bunny are really good to sell their on-the-edge stuff .. And I am a sucker for this as a non-hardcore-coder. If I had the cash I would already bought their stuff.

Please mighty Gogol lord, tell me not to buy in to this .. =)
 
cloudflare workers might change your opinion.
This.

I'm now building half of my web stuff using cloudflare workers and it's amazing.
Hmmm I have used cf workers in past for password protection but never really looked into them for serverless. I was looking into vercel serverless functions. Pricing for cf seems to be ok. How bad is the cold start?
 
a friendly bump :D

I don’t want to believe only 5-10 people here use js stacks. Where are you guys and girls?
 
for serverless i am using cloudflare pages, but still need huge improvement on their systems,
 
Back
Top