Serverifiedlinks & Serlinks Reviewed

After reading recommendations for the two most suggested link providers on the forum, I decided to subscribe to their services and see what the results would be.

Given that these guys are always hyped, my expectations were quite high, especially since I paid $40 for serlinks.

Here are the test parameters I used:
- 20 proxies
- New catchall email
- 150 threads
- Xevil 5
- 1-2 Gbps bandwidth
- 418 engine selected (D0 Follow/No Follow Mix)



For Serlinks:
- There are 3 folders, all of which have been added to the target URL list
- A total of 49,000 URLs,24k deduped
1,489 URLs have been verified

Result:



For Serverifiedlinks:
- A total of 143,000 URLs, with 64,000 deduped
12,847 URLs verified

%73 URL Shortener

Result:



These results appear quite disappointing to me, as I thoroughly checked every setting. Additionally, serverifiedlinks contains thousands of URLS from general blogs and WordPress articles that cannot be submitted. However, both lists are still marketed as "verified."

Do you guys have similar results?
@SativaBuzz @Turbo B. @JasonS @710fla @Kenro @ZillaRank @TimDawsone @KingNeanderthal @MutantAlex @Keells
@cherub

Will retest it soon. I will go only with serverifiedlists. And use their only verified links, with GSA captcha breaker as their list is done with it.

Standartuye said:

After reading recommendations for the two most suggested link providers on the forum, I decided to subscribe to their services and see what the results would be.

Given that these guys are always hyped, my expectations were quite high, especially since I paid $40 for serlinks.

Here are the test parameters I used:
- 20 proxies
- New catchall email
- 150 threads
- Xevil 5
- 1-2 Gbps bandwidth
- 418 engine selected (D0 Follow/No Follow Mix)

View attachment 308416

For Serlinks:
- There are 3 folders, all of which have been added to the target URL list
- A total of 49,000 URLs,24k deduped
1,489 URLs have been verified

Result:
View attachment 308417


For Serverifiedlinks:
- A total of 143,000 URLs, with 64,000 deduped
12,847 URLs verified

%73 URL Shortener

Result:
View attachment 308418


These results appear quite disappointing to me, as I thoroughly checked every setting. Additionally, serverifiedlinks contains thousands of URLS from general blogs and WordPress articles that cannot be submitted. However, both lists are still marketed as "verified."

Do you guys have similar results?
@SativaBuzz @Turbo B. @JasonS @710fla @Kenro @ZillaRank @TimDawsone @KingNeanderthal @MutantAlex @Keells
@cherub

Click to expand...

Hi! Happy New Year, guys! My lungs and liver are so busy with the past 10 days, thanks to Christmas and New Year, lol.

I have never built such a number of links in the last few years, as the SEO game has changed a lot. I like both services, and if you ask me to choose one service, I will go with the links. They only scrape with Google, and therefore, all the root domains are indexed with Google, which helps to pass the links from 1st crawling. I don't care about duplicates and hundreds of links, as there is no point. I don't use engines like indexers, exploits, etc. Use quality engines, or I just use their top-tier link folders. Both services got top tier links and built a few links per day, and I am good to go. millions of links from unique domains are a big no for me, and at least that's not my GSA strategy.

I have been using ser verified lists for more than a few years and ser links monthly with my needs, and I subscribe from time to time. But for new sites, I only use links for some time due to indexing benefits.

I wonder why you unchecked the most powerful engines instead of junk engines. I guess the answer depends on the strategy. If you are willing to build millions of links and sell them as a gig or something, I guess these services are not for you. Just try serpowerlists , gsalinklists instead. They offer big numbers i assume they scrape from outside of google as well. like bing etc. Since i use for my own projects its enough for me.

SativaBuzz said:

I wonder why you unchecked the most powerful engines instead of junk engines. I guess the answer depends on the strategy. If you are willing to build millions of links and sell them as a gig or something, I guess these services are not for you.

Click to expand...

What are the most powerful engines then? As I see in OP picture, he have them checked.

I will definitely avoid Serverifiedlists at the moment, almost all their links are junk/outdated, and it doesn't seems they scrape anymore. Using Gsaserlinks atm, the web 2.0 module is working without issue, the verified sitelist is a little more better than serverifiedlists, but still it's not what I'm looking for. Like OP said, some list providers are good in promoting their services, but when you check them you will get disappointed.

Will definitely try more services this week and post here.

Thank you, @SativaBuzz for the honest review.

The reason I have tried out several search engines is because, firstly, I wanted to see how many backlinks would be verified based on the advertised claims. Secondly, I use indexers and exploits as a second tier.

IMO, the results are obvious. Both lists are definitely of poor quality.

@mrnixdorf, I have started creating my own list.
You wouldn't believe the number of identified backlinks you can obtain by scraping the list provided by link sellers.
Just use the Scrapebox link extractor.

I've had more or less the same results.
Ofcourse they aren't verified lists.

From my point of view what they are doing is scrape the targets with Scrapebox and then running GSA Platform Identifier aganist these targets, so it is a list of identified links not verified ones.

For now the only verified list I've found is @710fla 's, but is a small list.

Standartuye said:

You wouldn't believe the number of identified backlinks you can obtain by scraping the list provided by link sellers.

Click to expand...

I've tried this method and the results were not bad, but you have to filter the list somehow to avoid spammed and low quality domains.

mrnixdorf said:

What are the most powerful engines then?

Click to expand...

Nothing. If you want to sell a service, sure, I would say articles, forums, etc, have great insight. But when it comes to ranking, I would say diversity. I don't overthink on engines; I use almost all engines except indexers and exploits on tier 1. That not because they are bad that because they just eat my resources before giving priority to other engines.

you can't build indexers and articles at the same time in one project. If you do, GSA will give first priority to the easy engine before the hard one.

i don't compare link list providers each list has different quality properties. i am not a big fan of web 2.0s as they don't pass the juice. good for use as a buffer site and never be able to index or they die after index. instead good to use generic or you can go with MR quality. no different MR or web2.0s so i have no idea mate

Standartuye said:

Thank you, @SativaBuzz for the honest review.

The reason I have tried out several search engines is because, firstly, I wanted to see how many backlinks would be verified based on the advertised claims. Secondly, I use indexers and exploits as a second tier.

IMO, the results are obvious. Both lists are definitely of poor quality.

@mrnixdorf, I have started creating my own list.
You wouldn't believe the number of identified backlinks you can obtain by scraping the list provided by link sellers.
Just use the Scrapebox link extractor.

Click to expand...

cheers man. creating your own list is cheaper than you go for it ..but whether you create ur own or buy a list, there is no difference in the quality as everyone uses the same engines and footprints I am a lazy man, so I prefer buying lists and loading up with my projects.

currently, I own 22 blogs, and I purchased 20 more domains on black Friday, but still struggling around as I have no time. (got time for everything but not for productivity lol )

Standartuye said:

After reading recommendations for the two most suggested link providers on the forum, I decided to subscribe to their services and see what the results would be.

Given that these guys are always hyped, my expectations were quite high, especially since I paid $40 for serlinks.

Here are the test parameters I used:
- 20 proxies
- New catchall email
- 150 threads
- Xevil 5
- 1-2 Gbps bandwidth
- 418 engine selected (D0 Follow/No Follow Mix)

View attachment 308416

For Serlinks:
- There are 3 folders, all of which have been added to the target URL list
- A total of 49,000 URLs,24k deduped
1,489 URLs have been verified

Result:
View attachment 308417


For Serverifiedlinks:
- A total of 143,000 URLs, with 64,000 deduped
12,847 URLs verified

%73 URL Shortener

Result:
View attachment 308418


These results appear quite disappointing to me, as I thoroughly checked every setting. Additionally, serverifiedlinks contains thousands of URLS from general blogs and WordPress articles that cannot be submitted. However, both lists are still marketed as "verified."

Do you guys have similar results?
@SativaBuzz @Turbo B. @JasonS @710fla @Kenro @ZillaRank @TimDawsone @KingNeanderthal @MutantAlex @Keells
@cherub

Click to expand...

Ah both stats look good to me. You see, having deduped links and syncs at the same time, it's like trying to dance flamenco and tango at once So, you gotta manually import those links, remove the dupz yourself, and then run it, which, let me tell you, is quite the hassle. Now solo lists, might be your thing. But I'm more of a dropbox sync fan, really love how it flows. And serlinks, yhey index super fast, . To be honest, your stats could soar even higher if you just uncheck those shortners and indexers.

In my campaigns, the blog comments average, it's a bit more than yours. Looks like GSA is trying to spice things up, pasting anchortext with percentage marks. Give a try on ahrefs, and you'll see a whole fiesta of anchortext with percentage mark. If that's the case, try switching to cooler, more generic anchortexts. Anchortext plays a huge role in success

What kind of project are you hitting on?

Guys check following thread starting from this post:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/s...h-engine-ranker.1280806/page-30#post-17167703

This is an interesting discussion. How many backlinks do you suggest per target in a low-competiton niche?

Yes, none of them are verified lists, but there are still many people advocating for them.