SEO Content Machine or Kontent Machine

Acura NSX

Acura NSX

Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Messages
31
Reaction score
7
For anyone who have used both, which one produces plagiarism-free articles that are good enough for blog posts?

I know I might get responses like better to write the posts myself or don't use article generators for money sites. I don't mind if either SEO Content Machine or Kontent Machine falls a little short in natural human writing, but as long as the content generated are very readable, unique, plagiarism-free, then I'm fine with it. Likewise, I'm likely and willing to tweaking them before posting.

Which of these 2 article generators would you recommend? Both have good selling points, though it seems that many users rely on Kontent Machine for backlinking or Tier 1, 2, 3 purposes. SEO Content Machine is the new kid on the block whereas Kontent Machine's been around since 2012. I'm planning on buying a lifetime license for one of them so I need to hear from others first.
 
Advertise on BHW
SEO content machine for me worked better. It is also easier to use.
 
SEO content machine is much better than kontent machine.
 
Having tried both I still recommend GSA Content Generator
 
710fla said:
Having tried both I still recommend GSA Content Generator
Click to expand...
SEO Content Machine seems much more versatile (can do both mass produce articles for backlink purposes and a writing assistant tool that makes it easier to write articles manually). It also includes a dozen other tools, it seems. Why would you recommend GSA Content Generator over SEO Content Machine?
 
Acura NSX said:
SEO Content Machine seems much more versatile (can do both mass produce articles for backlink purposes and a writing assistant tool that makes it easier to write articles manually). It also includes a dozen other tools, it seems. Why would you recommend GSA Content Generator over SEO Content Machine?
Click to expand...
I have a license to both tools and have used them both for many years. GSA Content Generator can do all the same things SEO content machine can, and even more, in fact. However, GSAC CG is a bit more convoluted to use as compared to SCM, and sometimes you have to edit source files to get it to do what you want it to (but only in advanced use cases).

SCM is quite buggy. I spent weeks working with the developer to get the static page scraper to work properly. It’s still buggy (truth is he doesn’t want you to use static page scraper since he charges you money for captcha in mass article creator - it’s self defeating to allow you to scrape your own url list and download without paying for captcha). They are both fantastic tools overall. They both work great for generating content.

I do think GSA CG is the better purchase but in terms of someone who doesn’t really know what they are are doing… SCM is probably the better choice. You can always switch over to GSA CG once you learn what you’re doing considering you have to keep paying for SCM forever despite it having a lifetime license.
 
GSA Content Generator has a writing assistant tool for manual writing? They both don't use the same sources, is that right? (just checking for redudancy)
 
Any distinct advantages for Kontent Machine over the others? well besides free updates for life.
 
Acura NSX said:
GSA Content Generator has a writing assistant tool for manual writing? They both don't use the same sources, is that right? (just checking for redudancy)
Click to expand...
They both have writing “assistants” for manual writing. GSA CG has more options there as well.

Kontent machine is crap. It was great in 2012. It has not changed since then. There are absolutely no advantages to using it except for how simple it is to get super poop content imported into SER (or anything else it exports to). It is very simple to use… that’s it.
 
Acura NSX said:
SEO Content Machine seems much more versatile (can do both mass produce articles for backlink purposes and a writing assistant tool that makes it easier to write articles manually). It also includes a dozen other tools, it seems. Why would you recommend GSA Content Generator over SEO Content Machine?
Click to expand...

Personally the GUI is cleaner, the default sources included are more than enough to create the amount of articles I need, I can tweak the output more than the other softwares, it can export directly to GSA SER, less resource intensive.

Haven’t used the others softwares in a while so maybe they improved but I just stick to GSA CG
 
Zombie Pop said:
I have a license to both tools and have used them both for many years. GSA Content Generator can do all the same things SEO content machine can, and even more, in fact. However, GSAC CG is a bit more convoluted to use as compared to SCM, and sometimes you have to edit source files to get it to do what you want it to (but only in advanced use cases).

SCM is quite buggy. I spent weeks working with the developer to get the static page scraper to work properly. It’s still buggy (truth is he doesn’t want you to use static page scraper since he charges you money for captcha in mass article creator - it’s self defeating to allow you to scrape your own url list and download without paying for captcha). They are both fantastic tools overall. They both work great for generating content.

I do think GSA CG is the better purchase but in terms of someone who doesn’t really know what they are are doing… SCM is probably the better choice. You can always switch over to GSA CG once you learn what you’re doing considering you have to keep paying for SCM forever despite it having a lifetime license.
Click to expand...

Is the captcha service a requirement for all / most of the tools to function in SCM, including the writing assistant and all the scrapers? -or is just for the article mass creator too.
 
Acura NSX said:
Is the captcha service a requirement for all / most of the tools to function in SCM, including the writing assistant and all the scrapers? -or is just for the article mass creator too.
Click to expand...
everything in scm that searches in google can incur captcha fees. You cannot use your own service or software to solve the captchas. You have to pay the company that makes scm in order to use that functionality in the form of captcha credits everytime. It’s a racket.
 
Zombie Pop said:
They both have writing “assistants” for manual writing. GSA CG has more options there as well.

Kontent machine is crap. It was great in 2012. It has not changed since then. There are absolutely no advantages to using it except for how simple it is to get super poop content imported into SER (or anything else it exports to). It is very simple to use… that’s it.
Click to expand...

I see that GSA Content Generator has the article editor for manual writing assistance, but it seems like it doesn't have any other function besides choosing scraped sentences to insert into manual article writing, which SEO CM can also do - but with an inlcuded filter option to narrow down the desired sentences to consider. The SEO CM also includes a metric for keyword tracking, to assure all SEO keywords have been included.

SEO CM also have a paraphrasing tool. Does GSA Content Generator have these features? maybe I overlooked it, or it's hidden somewhere.
 
I really don’t know these intricacies between to the two tools. I don’t use them very often anymore. I switched to AI generated content several months ago and I just really don’t remember this level of detail within the two tools.

I never used the article suggestion tools or manual writing tools within either of them except to play around with them. I never thought much of the writing assistant in SCM. All I got was garbage out of that.
 
Zombie Pop said:
everything in scm that searches in google can incur captcha fees. You cannot use your own service or software to solve the captchas. You have to pay the company that makes scm in order to use that functionality in the form of captcha credits everytime. It’s a racket.
Click to expand...
Oh I see. That kinda suks then. I do have GSA proxy scraper, can't that be used alongside SEO CM, since GSA Proxy Scraper can turn your PC into a proxy server, and SEO CM wouldn't know the difference anyway.
 
Acura NSX said:
Oh I see. That kinda suks then. I do have GSA proxy scraper, can't that be used alongside SEO CM, since GSA Proxy Scraper can turn your PC into a proxy server, and SEO CM wouldn't know the difference anyway.
Click to expand...
that might be a good way to test if the captcha billing is honest or if they are just billing arbitrarily (I don’t use Gsa proxy scraper so idk). I was never sure if the billing is honest or if I would be arbitrarily charged for captchas I wasn’t actually encountering.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top