1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

SENuke Xcr vs UD for tier 1 web 2.0

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by Th0rr, Oct 16, 2012.

  1. Th0rr

    Th0rr Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    68
    Hi,

    just wanted to ask senuke xcr and ud users if now with the macro recorded the situation has changed towards senuke for tier 1 web 2.0 properties ?

    I find the macro recorded really good but I don't see myself adding all those web 2.0 website one by one manually...

    Thanks
     
  2. eng152

    eng152 Power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    2,068
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    Port 80
    Home Page:
    You better to go with UD if you don't have time to make scripts. Some of members share own lists when you buy UD via affiliate links. I get 100-200+ Web 2.0 Properties per submission from UD.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Th0rr

    Th0rr Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    68
    Yes, that's what I thought, and there's no way to bulk import scripts in XCr if I'm not mistaken (I've been trying it since a few days).
    Any other input appreciated :)
     
  4. trustedfire9

    trustedfire9 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,096
    Likes Received:
    1,779
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. MatthewWoodward

    MatthewWoodward Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    992
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Occupation:
    SEO
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    Check out the link in my sig for tutorials of how I use UD instead of nuke.

    The only way nuke xcr justifys its cost per month in my opinion is if you are the type of person that hits a lot of platforms current tools dont and you take the time to automate what is already a long manual process for yourself. Then it pays for itself, but otherwise its not really worth it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. Th0rr

    Th0rr Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    68
    Yes, and there's so few web2.0 already included in senuke xcr... if at least there was more.
    Thanks for the answer, and I've already looked at your videos few days ago :)
     
  7. 0_00_0

    0_00_0 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,024
    Likes Received:
    486
    Location:
    Canada
    The downfall to UD is that many of these lists will gradually decline in success rate as the websites change (you can always scrape for more websites, though!). SEnuke is just easier because it's constantly updated but much more expensive and not as flexible. That's very impressive that someone is getting 100-200+ web2.0 submissions from a UD blast.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. 0_00_0

    0_00_0 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,024
    Likes Received:
    486
    Location:
    Canada
    Definitely just your opinion haha. The tool is great it's just very expensive.