Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
I rarely use Nuke any more. Enjoyed it for a while, but then realised how little it was actually doing when I checked the quantity and quality of links it was creating when compared with campaigns I had done with stand-alone tools
Lot's of features. None of them creating a lot for me.
Can you sort out keywords? Not very well - ( IMO it's crap at this. The free google keyword tool is better) USe MNF and Market Samurai
Please make 100's of accounts - great feature - huge failure rate. Maybe not Nuke's fault as the big boys clamp down on auto e-mail gen and such-like, but for $127 I expect better. (SBD has about a 20% failure rate in my experience, far far better than Nuke)
Can you spin content? - Not very well. Please "plug in" BAspinner
Ok how about posting. Shit barely 50% success rate. Worse still it's the big boys you fail with. Post most on the shitty "rent a 'zine" sites that seem to be created just for somewhere for programs like this to dump into. Fail to post in the big well known sites too often (fail to even make the bloody accounts - end up putting my own in manually)
Check links a fortnight later. Well, ok, not bad, but given the drop off every step of the way, a campaign with 25,000 link potential struggles to hit 12-1500, often less.
I use separate tools that let me configure them. Yeah it takes longer to set up in terms of a campaign run.
Yes you need to spend 1 whole day on a website rather than 2 hoursm but you get 8-10,000 links instead of 10-1300 at the end of it.
Also, once you've paid $500 bucks - they are all yours.
Then there's Xrumer. Self hosted even. $550 bucks, 20 good proxies and a $10 bill a month.
In six months time while people are still arsing about with "nuke" Xrumer will have cost less, and be pumping out 10X the links while they sleep.
If nuke did what it said it would WELL as opposed to the failure drop off every step of the way, then yes, it would be worth it. It has the feature set and potential to be a great tool. But it doesn't.
Perhaps it did once, when e-mail account creation was easy, and before free proxies were mass blacklisted by social networks.
In my experience it's not worth it at the moment. It's not giving the high ranking PR sites per hour that it should.
Verdict: Only for those very short of time who are happy with mediocre results
Maybe NukeX is the answer. I hope so.
Also a big bug bear for me...
The annoying kid on the site vid "pay attention". I won't tell you what I would do to someone who said that to me in the manner he uses in real life.
Scritty
Lot's of features. None of them creating a lot for me.
Can you sort out keywords? Not very well - ( IMO it's crap at this. The free google keyword tool is better) USe MNF and Market Samurai
Please make 100's of accounts - great feature - huge failure rate. Maybe not Nuke's fault as the big boys clamp down on auto e-mail gen and such-like, but for $127 I expect better. (SBD has about a 20% failure rate in my experience, far far better than Nuke)
Can you spin content? - Not very well. Please "plug in" BAspinner
Ok how about posting. Shit barely 50% success rate. Worse still it's the big boys you fail with. Post most on the shitty "rent a 'zine" sites that seem to be created just for somewhere for programs like this to dump into. Fail to post in the big well known sites too often (fail to even make the bloody accounts - end up putting my own in manually)
Check links a fortnight later. Well, ok, not bad, but given the drop off every step of the way, a campaign with 25,000 link potential struggles to hit 12-1500, often less.
I use separate tools that let me configure them. Yeah it takes longer to set up in terms of a campaign run.
But in terms of "good links per minute of my time" then excellent stand alone tools beat Nuke hands down.
Yes you need to spend 1 whole day on a website rather than 2 hoursm but you get 8-10,000 links instead of 10-1300 at the end of it.
Also, once you've paid $500 bucks - they are all yours.
Then there's Xrumer. Self hosted even. $550 bucks, 20 good proxies and a $10 bill a month.
In six months time while people are still arsing about with "nuke" Xrumer will have cost less, and be pumping out 10X the links while they sleep.
If nuke did what it said it would WELL as opposed to the failure drop off every step of the way, then yes, it would be worth it. It has the feature set and potential to be a great tool. But it doesn't.
Perhaps it did once, when e-mail account creation was easy, and before free proxies were mass blacklisted by social networks.
In my experience it's not worth it at the moment. It's not giving the high ranking PR sites per hour that it should.
Verdict: Only for those very short of time who are happy with mediocre results
Maybe NukeX is the answer. I hope so.
Also a big bug bear for me...
The annoying kid on the site vid "pay attention". I won't tell you what I would do to someone who said that to me in the manner he uses in real life.
Scritty