1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sendblaster VS Atomic Mail Sender

Discussion in 'Making Money' started by q3rage, Oct 22, 2015.

  1. q3rage

    q3rage Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    7
    If anyone here has used the two can you post which one you think is better.

    They both seem to have the same features. I'm looking at the demo for each one but would like to know if one is faster than the other when it comes to using the paid version using an external SMTP instead of its direct send feature.

    I'm sure the speed of it will depend heavily on the SMTP server you use but lets say for example I were to use the same exact dedicated server, would one be faster than the other?

    Thanks
     
  2. q3rage

    q3rage Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    7
    Also how does MailerKing fair against these two? (using an SMTP server not webmailing)
     
  3. Skyebug77

    Skyebug77 Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,185
    Likes Received:
    1,586
    Occupation:
    Marketing
    Location:
    Portland,Or
    Send Blaster I think is the best, though I haven't tried the other ones. But send blaster is pretty good.