1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Search Engine Facts?? Truth or Fiction

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by dssxxxx, Mar 28, 2012.

  1. dssxxxx

    dssxxxx Registered Member

    Jan 24, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Received this email yesterday. Have not C&P all of it.

    Does/will this affect the tools (GSA, Slig, UD, etc.) that are on the market as of this new statement or you think it's all BS?

    See below:

    Welcome to the latest issue of the Search Engine Facts newsletter.
    Last week, Matt Cutts, head of Google's anti-spam team, announced that Google is working on a penalty for over-optimized websites. What does this announcement mean to your website and how should you react to this announcement?

    In the news: Google announces another Panda update, paid blog networks don't work anymore, you might have to hide your location on Google Places, how Bing removes junk from the result pages and more.

    Here's what Matt Cutts said in detail:

    "We don?t normally pre-announce changes but there is something we are working in the last few months and hope to release it in the next months or few weeks. We are trying to level the playing field a bit.

    All those people doing, for lack of a better word, over-optimization or overly SEO ? versus those making great content and great site. We are trying to make GoogleBot smarter, make our relevance better, and we are also looking for those who abuse it, like too many keywords on a page, or exchange way too many links or go well beyond what you normally expect. We have several engineers on my team working on this right now."
  2. Scritty

    Scritty Elite Member Premium Member

    May 1, 2010
    Likes Received:
    Affiliate Marketer

    This is another way of saying EXACTLY the same thing this David Brent lookalike prat has been saying for years.

    Let me tell you something for nothing.

    He's FULL of shit

    "Taking down link networks"
    He talks like he owns the fecking internet

    The only thing he can "take them down" from is &oogl£ ranking, and in this day and age, if you're getting more than 50% of your traffic from Google you need to re-assess your IM strategy and FAST.

    BMR all these other sites were openly advertising "links for sale".
    MC would like you all to think he's developed a sinister "weapon of SERPS destruction" but he hasn't.

    Finding the sites in BMR and these other link buying networks is stupid easy.

    Join the network with a new site
    Ask network to make links
    Run a link checking program
    There's the sites for you in a nice list

    Hell the free version of traffic travis and a a bit of patience is all you need to find all the sites in a network

    MC would have you think he's develping an "uber" algorithm, and that there are rooms of white coated boffins with massive bald heads and top pockets full of biros tutting over clipboards full of stats as they tweak algorithm metrics beyond human understanding

    When in fact he's got a hamster on a wheel looking at where the links he posted on a network show up and then pressing a button to delist the site

    I mean frankly, if he's taken the first route he's even more of a chuffing idiot than he looks. It'd cost 50x more, take longer, involve a lot more risk and be far less accurate

    But feck me he does look like an idiot

    The geek from "Inbetweeners" meets David Brent from UK "The Office"
    Don't fret. make good conent, then make tons of links toit from all over the place

    That's always worked and I'd bet this years wages it always will no matter what that tool head Cutts would like you to believe

    (PS - EVERYONE get your traffic from more places than Google. It's getting easier and easier to get decent quality targeted traffic from many places now. Bing and Yahoo are decent again, YOutube, Twitter, Facebook - heven social sites, blogs and what have you. Make sure Google is responsible for as small a percent of traffic as you can - then who gives a f^ck what Mutt Catts thinks or does anyway)

  3. dssxxxx

    dssxxxx Registered Member

    Jan 24, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Sounds reasonable.......:)

    UD is still in the running........;)